DIGILEC Revista Internacional de Lenguas y Culturas
Digilec 12 (2025), pp. 20-40
Fecha de recepción: 11/01/2025
Fecha de aceptación: 02/05/2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17979/digilec.2025.12.11604
e-ISSN: 2386-6691
COGNITIVE SOCIAL EMOTIONAL LEARNING (CSEL) AS AN
INTEGRATED TOOL TO IMPROVE LINGUISTIC MOTHER
TONGUE AND LITERACY AMONG CHILDREN IN
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
EL APRENDIZAJE COGNITIVO SOCIAL EMOCIONAL (CSEL)
COMO HERRAMIENTA INTEGRADA PARA MEJORAR LA
LENGUA MATERNA LINGÜÍSTICA Y LA ALFABETIZACIÓN DE
LOS NIÑOS EN LA ESCUELA PRIMARIA
Neve Freyja GULL
Universidad de Córdoba
Orcid: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7019-8312
Abstract
The El Hasade approach (Precision, Articulation, Conception, Enhancing vocabulary;
PACE in English) represents a comprehensive methodology integrating cognitive,
emotional, and social dimensions to enhance linguistic literacy among elementary school
students. This multidimensional approach provides foundational skills that support both
academic achievement and personal development. Study findings highlight the critical
importance of early-age learning experiences in determining students' future educational
outcomes. The Cognitive, Social, and Emotional Learning (CSEL) intervention
demonstrated significant effectiveness in fostering student independence, adaptability in
learning approaches, and improved coping mechanisms.
PACE methodology acknowledges the insufficiency of social-emotional learning (SEL)
alone for maximizing classroom academic performance. While SEL remains widespread
throughout American and European educational systems, PACE introduces an innovative
dimension—metacognition—that guides student in effective learning strategies,
alternative thinking patterns, and higher-order thinking skills. This metacognitive
emphasis distinguishes PACE from traditional SEL approaches by equipping students
with comprehensive cognitive capabilities essential for academic success.
Research confirms emotional intelligence as a fundamental determinant of academic
achievement. Social learning components, including cooperative activities and group
projects, have proven instrumental in developing interpersonal competencies and
DIGILEC Revista Internacional de Lenguas y Culturas 21
Digilec 12 (2025), pp. 20-40
fostering positive classroom environments. Concurrently, cognitive learning
incorporating sensory-motor activities has demonstrably enhanced students' mental
capabilities, particularly in language acquisition and literacy development. The El Hasade
approach aligns with established literature while providing a holistic framework for
elementary language acquisition. Although current findings support PACE effectiveness,
expanded research encompassing larger populations across diverse grade levels would
provide additional validation and deeper insights.
Keywords: Cognition; SEL; senso-motoric; literacy; elementary school; mother tongue
Resumen
El enfoque El Hasade (Precisión, Articulación, Concepción, Enriquecimiento de
vocabulario; PACE en inglés) constituye una metodología integral que incorpora
dimensiones cognitivas, emocionales y sociales para potenciar la alfabetización
lingüística en estudiantes de primaria. Este planteamiento multidimensional proporciona
habilidades fundamentales que respaldan tanto el rendimiento académico como el
desarrollo personal. Los hallazgos del estudio subrayan la importancia crítica de las
experiencias de aprendizaje temprano en la determinación de los resultados educativos
futuros. La intervención de Aprendizaje Cognitivo, Social y Emocional (CSEL) demostró
una eficacia significativa en el fomento de la independencia estudiantil, la adaptabilidad
en los enfoques de aprendizaje y la mejora de los mecanismos de afrontamiento.
La metodología PACE reconoce la insuficiencia del aprendizaje socioemocional (SEL)
por sí solo para maximizar el rendimiento académico en el aula. Mientras el SEL
permanece generalizado en los sistemas educativos estadounidenses y europeos, PACE
introduce una dimensión innovadora—la metacogniciónque orienta a los estudiantes
en estrategias de aprendizaje eficaces, patrones de pensamiento alternativos y habilidades
de pensamiento de orden superior. Este énfasis metacognitivo distingue a PACE de los
enfoques SEL tradicionales al equipar a los estudiantes con capacidades cognitivas
integrales esenciales para el éxito académico.
La investigación confirma la inteligencia emocional como determinante fundamental del
rendimiento académico. Los componentes de aprendizaje social han demostrado ser
instrumentales en el desarrollo de competencias interpersonales. Simultáneamente, el
aprendizaje cognitivo que incorpora actividades sensoriomotoras ha mejorado
demostrablemente las capacidades mentales de los estudiantes. El enfoque El Hasade
proporciona un marco holístico para la adquisición del lenguaje en primaria. Aunque los
hallazgos actuales respaldan la eficacia de PACE, una investigación ampliada
proporcionaría validación adicional.
Palabras clave: Cognición; SEL; sensoriomotor; alfabetización; escuela primaria;
lengua materna
DIGILEC Revista Internacional de Lenguas y Culturas 22
Digilec 12 (2025), pp. 20-40
1. THEORETICAL BACKDROP
Learning to read and write is an essential skill that, unfortunately, not all children
learn sufficiently or receive the same opportunity to acquire (Benner et al., 2022). The
differences are more evident between developed and developing countries (Genlott &
Grönlund, 2013). In a time when societal change puts increasing demands on individuals’
competence in using written language, schools must teach such skills to all children. The
“information society” means a massive rise in informational activities due to the internet
and other related information and communication technology (ICT) activities. More
people need enhanced literacy skills to find, select, interpret, analyze, and produce
information (Carpenter & Franke, 2010a).
Sensory systems are prodigious in their ability to reshape response properties
following learning, and in the auditory system, plasticity has been observed from the
cochlea to the cortex (Kraus & White-Schwoch, 2015). This learning is fundamental to
our ability to function in and adapt to our environments. Experience navigating this
sensory world drives language development perhaps the most remarkable learning task
humans can accomplish and it is necessary to understand the principles that govern this
plasticity to devise strategies to improve language and communication as well as
scientific and mathematical skills in normal and disordered educational systems (Sands
et al., 2015).
The Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) international
benchmark on literacy includes four levels: low (locate and retrieve information),
intermediate (make straightforward references), high (make inferences and
interpretations with text-based support), and advanced (integrate ideas and information
across texts to provide reasons and explanations) (Mullis et al., 2012). The information
society requires more people to acquire skills towards this scale's high end (Szymkowiak
et al., 2021). In Mullis et al.’s (2012) benchmark, even the highest-performing countries
only barely achieve a score of 20% in the “advanced” category and just over 60% in the”
high” category. Hence, improvement in literacy skills is essential in every country. Early
age (5-7 years old) learning is crucial as, according to Myrberg (2007), children who lag
in the early years of reading and writing development encounter considerable difficulties
in following education later as texts get longer and more complicated.
The lag described here was again proved in later research that cognitive, social, and
emotional learning (CSEL) is a comprehensive and integrated approach to education that
combines mental, emotional, and social learning to promote student success. It is
considered a predictor of learning abilities in children and young adults' early and later
learning stages (Caprara et al., 2011). Benner et al. (2022) have shown that students who
are exposed to social and emotional learning (SEL) methods (without the cognitive
component, which will be emphasized in this work) tend to have better academic
outcomes, including improved linguistic, scientific, and mathematical literacy. This
approach can be particularly beneficial for students in elementary schools, where
foundational skills are being developed.
DIGILEC Revista Internacional de Lenguas y Culturas 23
Digilec 12 (2025), pp. 20-40
CSEL includes cognitive and social-emotional learning components, among which
emotional learning is a key element. SEL is developing self-awareness, self-control, and
interpersonal skills vital for school, work, and life success. People with strong social-
emotional skills can better cope with everyday challenges and benefit academically,
professionally, and socially (UNICEF, 2023). Emotional intelligence is critical to
academic success and linked to improved educational outcomes, including higher grades
and standardized test scores. In an elementary school setting, emotional learning can help
students better understand and regulate their emotions, leading to improved focus and
attention in the classroom (Carter et al., 2004).
Another critical aspect of CSEL is social learning. Social learning refers to the
process by which students learn from peers. Social learning can take many forms in
elementary school, including cooperative learning, peer tutoring, and group projects
(WGU, 2020). By working with others, students can develop critical social skills, such as
communication, collaboration, and problem-solving, essential for success in school and
beyond (Carpenter & Franke, 2010a).
Cognitive learning is also an essential component of CSEL (Carpenter & Franke,
2010a). This approach to education recognizes that students learn best when actively
engaged in the learning process. In an elementary school setting, this may involve hands-
on, experiential learning activities that allow students to apply what they have learned in
real-world contexts. For example, students might engage in scientific experiments,
mathematical problem-solving activities, or linguistic challenges that require them to
think critically and creatively (Voskoglou & Buckley, 2012). Thus, engaging children in
sensory and motor activities such as drawing, writing, and physical activities can enhance
their cognitive abilities, including language and literacy. These activities stimulate the
brain and improve hand-eye coordination, essential for writing and reading. Additionally,
children can develop their attention, memory, and problem-solving skills by participating
in these activities, which are fundamental for language and literacy acquisition.
Promoting sensory and motor skills can significantly impact the development of linguistic
and literacy abilities in elementary school children (Battaglia et al., 2020). Furthermore,
sensory activities, such as playing with toys, touching textures, and exploring the
environment, can help children develop their sensory perception and memory skills,
which are crucial for language and literacy acquisition (Greven et al., 2019). By engaging
in sensory experiences, children can learn to identify and remember words and concepts
and form connections between the physical world and language. Similarly, motor
activities, such as drawing, writing, and physical exercise, can help children develop the
fine motor skills required for writing and reading. Hand-eye coordination, dexterity, and
muscle control are crucial for legibly writing letters and words and tracking lines of text
when reading. Physical activities can also help develop attention, memory, and problem-
solving skills, which are essential for language and literacy acquisition (Battaglia et al.,
2020).
Incorporating sensory and motor activities into elementary school children's daily
routines can profoundly impact their linguistic and literacy abilities. These activities can
make learning more engaging, help children retain information, and create a foundation
for continued growth and development. By promoting sensory and motor skills, teachers
DIGILEC Revista Internacional de Lenguas y Culturas 24
Digilec 12 (2025), pp. 20-40
and parents can help children build the skills they need to become successful language
learners and literate individuals.
Finally, CSEL emphasizes the importance of a supportive learning environment.
This can include a positive and inclusive school culture and practical classroom
management strategies that promote student engagement and motivation (Carpenter &
Franke, 2010b). Teachers can help students feel valued and respected by creating a
supportive learning environment, improving academic outcomes, including enhanced
linguistic, scientific, and mathematical literacy. CSEL supports a thorough and included
approach to education that can positively impact linguistic, scientific, and mathematical
literacy among students in elementary schools. By merging cognitive, emotional, and
social learning strengths, CESL can help students develop the foundational skills they
need to succeed in school and beyond (OECD, 2021).
2. OBJECTIVES AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS
This research work has set the following main objectives:
Objective no. 1. To analyze the language achievements of the methodology EL
HASADE (PACE) on elementary students within seven groups: 6 groups of
students that will be detailed afterward and one group of teachers. This will be
measured quantitatively.
Objective no. 2. To study teachers' perceptions regarding the effect of cognitive
and social-emotional learning on the same groups of students’ motivation and
classroom climate. This will be measured according to teachers' testimonials.
Other vital objectives of this article were:
S.O.1. To analyze students’ numeral achievements pre- and post-test to “El
Hasade- PACE intervention method for literacy acquisition improvement.
S.O.2. To analyze teachers’ testimonials to see if they think that, according to their
observations of children in the classroom, cognitive, social, and emotional
intervention (CSEL) plays a crucial role in developing student's motivation in
elementary school children.
S.O.3. To analyze teachers’ testimonials to see if they think that, according to their
observations of children in the classroom, the PACE integration method
conducted here has a crucial role in developing positive classroom change in
elementary school children.
Then, the following research questions are sought to be answered:
R.Q.1. Can cognitive, social-emotional learning, as exhibited in the PACE method
as an integrated tool, improve language achievements among children in elementary
schools in Israel?
R.Q.2. Can cognitive, social-emotional learning, as exhibited in the PACE method
as an integrated tool, improve motivation among children in elementary schools in
Israel?
DIGILEC Revista Internacional de Lenguas y Culturas 25
Digilec 12 (2025), pp. 20-40
R.Q.3. Can cognitive, social-emotional learning, as exhibited in the PACE method
as an integrated tool, improve classroom climate?
3. METHODOLOGY
3.1. Context
EL HASADE (Hebrew acronym for precision, articulation, conception, enhancing
vocabulary; PACE in English hereinafter) is a worldview of language learning, as well as
Science and Mathematics through four specific conducts that disassemble the field of
knowledge to its components through changing levels of thinking and diverse learning
forms. The method focuses on skills using various types of memory (i.e., visual, auditory,
and sensory-motoric), in which the student experiences language acquisition and multiple
areas of opinion through rhythmic “working stations.” The method was primarily
invented in the US, moved to Scandinavia (especially to Finland), and with its help, the
Finns achieved exceptional results in local and foreign languages (Ahonen, 2021).
PACE operates on the following three levels:
a. The cognitive level: learn using all types of memory skills.
b. Social and emotional levels: while deciphering all the principles of SEL.
c. Level of knowledge, information, and content.
The program aims to enhance students’ competencies, creativity, and curiosity.
According to teachers’ testimonials, another aspect is that sensory and motor skills
incorporated in the PACE method play a crucial role in the development of linguistic and
literacy abilities in elementary school children, which affect all three dimensions tested
in this research.
3.2. Participants
Group 1 Third Grade in the city of Holon. 29 students tested (p1 to p29). The
teacher is a former math teacher who was trained with the students on literacy skills. The
school has a very low grade on a socio-economic level (7.25 out of 10, which is the score
that the Ministry of Education ranks each school in Israel in several parameters of wealth
and strength of the school’s population, where one is the strongest and 10 is the weakest).
The school is Jewish and secular. Immigrant students (most of them refugees) came from
Russia, Ukraine, and Sudan.
Group 2—Third Grade in the city of Holon. 22 students tested (p30 to p52), most
of whom were new immigrants. Some have Russian and Ukrainian origins, and some are
from Africa. The teacher is the same as in the first group, but the difference here is that
she is not the home teacher in this class.
Group 3 4th graders in a Jewish religious school in Ashkelon. 25 students tested
(p53 to 78)—all native Hebrew speakers. The school is graded 6 out of 10 at the socio-
economic level (relatively weak). The teacher is a home class teacher and a Hebrew
teacher in training. 4th graders in Israel are tested differently than all other classes. Whilst
other classes have December and May internal exams for assessing improvements, 4th
DIGILEC Revista Internacional de Lenguas y Culturas 26
Digilec 12 (2025), pp. 20-40
graders are tested in a national exam only once, and that grades the school towards similar
schools in its region/religion/socio-economic status, etc.
Group 4 – 5th graders in a secular Jewish school in the northern part of the country,
all the students are native Hebrew speakers. 22 students tested (p79 to 101). The school
is considered highly strong in socio-economic status (2.0 out of 10). The school is graded
3 out of 10 in its socioeconomic level, meaning reasonably high. As mentioned in group
3, 4th graders in Israel are tested differently than all other classes. Whilst other classes
have December and May internal exams for assessing improvements, 4th graders are
tested in a national exam only once, and that grades the school towards similar schools in
its region/religion/socio-economic status, etc.
Group 6—control group. Third grade. The control group was taken from the same
school as group 3 in Ashkelon, except they did not work with PACE, and the research did
not intervene in their studies.
Group 7 – Teachers
A group of 10 teachers participated in the semi-structured questionnaire. Nine out of 10
teachers were experiencing the method in their class; one was on maternity leave, so her
class was the research's control group.
T1 – 3rd grade class teacher in religious school
T2 3rd-grade class teacher (control group) on maternity leave
T3 – 3rd grade class teacher in religious school
T4 – 3rd grade class teacher in secular school
T5 – 5th grade class teacher in secular school
T6 – 4th-grade teacher in a secular school
T7 – 5th grade class teacher in religious school
T8 – 4th-grade teacher in a secular school
T9 3rd-grade class teacher in a secular school for new immigrants
T10 – 4th grade class teacher in secular school
3.3. Instruments
Two instruments were used to cover the four objectives of this research:
Specific Objective No. 1: For achievements, the formal Israeli Ministry of
Education mapping has been used, conducted twice a year (in December and in May)
across the country. The exam is in Hebrew and assesses language skills, reading and
writing comprehension, vocabulary, grammar, and high-order thinking language skills for
the 4th-grade exam. The formal outcomes published by the Israeli Ministry of Education
have been taken for this research.
Specific Objective No. 2: A semi-structured questionnaire was conducted among
teachers who implemented the PACE method in their classrooms to assess classroom
climate changes.
Specific Objective No. 3: For emotional and personal motivation among elementary
students, a semi-structured questionnaire was conducted among teachers who
implemented the PACE method in their classrooms. This questionnaire has been validated
through the Delphi method, and it includes the following questions:
DIGILEC Revista Internacional de Lenguas y Culturas 27
Digilec 12 (2025), pp. 20-40
1. Write how the “El Hasade” (PACE) method affected you as a teacher.
2. How did the “El Hasade” (PACE) method affect the classroom climate and
learning culture?
3. Did the “El Hasade” (PACE) method affect students’ abilities? If so, can you
elaborate on how it did it?
4. Explain whether there is a change in students’ motivation when “El Hasade”
(PACE) is implemented in the classroom.
5. Do you have any additional insights from the “El Hasade” (PACE) method that
you can share here?
3.4. Variables
The following variables are identified for this study:
Independent Variable 1 - I.V.1. PACE ("El Hasade") - Social-emotional and
cognitive learning as an integrative tool.
Dependent Variable 1 - D.V.1. Achievement improvement.
Dependent Variable 2 - D.V.2. Classroom climate improvement.
Dependent variable 3 - D.V.3 Students’ motivation.
Moderating variable 1 M.V.1. Native Hebrew speakers vs. new immigrants
(Hebrew as a second language - HSL).
Mediating variable ME.V. Teacher’s willingness to invest in the process.
3.5. Procedure
This research follows Mixed-Methods Research, through which qualitative and
quantitative data were analyzed. It examines teachers’ attitudes regarding climate change
in the classroom and students' beliefs in emotional competence.
In the quantitative part, anonymous mappings of classes of students from the second
grade to the sixth grade of mother tongue language have been conducted at the beginning
of a year, before the intervention of the method, and at the end of the school year after the
intervention by using PACE; that is, a pre-and post-test comparative analysis will be
conducted.
Data were collected from different schools in Israel, and the researcher of this study
has access to dozens of schools in Israel where PACE is being implemented, namely from
schools in the Arab and Jewish sectors of the Israeli population. The study encompasses
four schools with six classes. To the best knowledge of the authors of this study, no
research has been done that combines an examination of the three abovementioned
dimensions (i.e., the cognitive level, the social and emotional level). The current research
is unique also due to its focus on examining teachers' opinions about social-emotional
change in their classroom and on the cross-reference with the achievements and grades
of the students. Data will allow us to check whether there is a connection between the
teachers’ perceptions that this kind of intervention improves the grades, the classroom
climate, and the student’s sense of emotional competence in their class. Hence, the
DIGILEC Revista Internacional de Lenguas y Culturas 28
Digilec 12 (2025), pp. 20-40
qualitative part of the current research is based on conducting 50 semi-structured
interviews with teachers.
Content analysis has been conducted by following the Grounded Theory Model
(Creswell & Poth, 2018), which these authors define as: “a qualitative research design in
which the inquirer generates a general explanation (a theory) of a process, an action, or
an interaction” (pp. 315–316).
4. RESULTS
Results will be arranged according to the Research objectives established for this
study, according to the influence of the independent variables: D.V.1 (achievements) for
quantitative data (i.e., research objective no. 1); D.V.2 (classroom climate), and D.V.3
(students’ motivation) (both of these for qualitative data, i.e., research objective no. 2).
4.1. Results for Research Objective no. 1 (quantitative data)
Before and after intervention (3rd grade).
Table 1
Results objective no. 1 – (quantitative data) results (pre- and post-intervention)
No. of
participating
students
Results
Dec. 2022
Average
Pre-
intervention
Results
May 2023
Average
Post-
intervention
Percentage
change
School 1
(3rd grade)
29
44.857
88.571
97.43%
School 2
(3rd grade)
22
60.787
86
55.77%
School 3
(5th grade)
22
61.90476
74.38095
20.13%
School 6
(3rd grade)
24
76.522
68.435
-10.58%
DIGILEC Revista Internacional de Lenguas y Culturas 29
Digilec 12 (2025), pp. 20-40
Table 2
Students' achievement data on reading comprehension for Nitzan school - 4th grade
High
performance
performance
Low-medium
performance
Low
performance
The school in
2023 post
intervention
76%
4%
7%
The school in
2022 Pre-
intervention
64%
16%
4%
Other schools
in the region in
2023
64%
8%
11%
Note. Source: Israeli Ministry of Education, 2023. The percentage change after
intervention is 18.75%.
These national results have been translated from Hebrew. They reflect the Nitzan
school's position on this official site in 2023 compared to other schools in that region and
to the school itself in 2022 (before the intervention). The percentage change after the
intervention is 18.75% (Ministry of Education, 2023).
Table 3
Students' achievement on reading comprehension data for Rosh Haayin school - 4th
grade
High
performance
Medium-high
performance
Medium-low
performance
Low
performance
The school
in 2023
78%
16%
4%
2%
The school
in 2022
51%
29%
6%
14%
Other
schools in
the region in
2023
64%
17%
8%
11%
Note. Data source: Israeli Ministry of Education, 2023. Results show significant
improvement in high performance category from 2022 to 2023 (51% to 78%),
demonstrating 52.94% increase after intervention.
Official results for Rosh Haayin school on students’ achievement (reading
comprehension) were taken from the Israel Ministry of Education (2023). These are
DIGILEC Revista Internacional de Lenguas y Culturas 30
Digilec 12 (2025), pp. 20-40
national results translated from Hebrew, which reflect the school's position in 2023 as
opposed to other schools in its region and to the school itself in 2022 (before the
intervention). The percentage change after the intervention is 52.94%.
4.2. Results for Research Objective No. 2 (qualitative data).
Data in this section belong to the content analysis obtained from the semi-structured
questionnaire to ten participating teachers in the “El Hasade” method. Answers are
arranged according to the questions:
Q1: How did the “El Hasade” PACE method affect you as a teacher?
3 prominent reactions to this question were:
T4: “At first with a lot of concerns about the process and success, but after
several attempts and the assimilation in the class, I was excited to see the
children's cooperation in the process”.
T6: “A winning method. First, she instilled in me the joy of teaching. I wished
for a change and the creation of quality and optimal interest in the language.
I get excited every time I hear the girls are waiting for this class. My thinking
for each student and work efficiency has increased on several levels. Also, the
quality of teaching…”
T3: “This method has affected me in that I feel much more professional in my
planned and focused work. The very fact that in every class I met and heard
all the students from my past at the station focused me much more on my work
and, of course, also the matter of teaching diversity”.
Q2: How did the “El Hasade” PACE method affect the classroom climate and
learning culture?
The teachers who were involved in the process mentioned significant changes in their
classroom climate:
T1: “The method had an effect in that the children learned to care for each
other during work and continued to the rest of the lessons and breaks, learning
in a different, more independent and diverse way”.
T7: “In the 5th grade, in my opinion, the atmosphere has improved, but real
persistence is needed in several subjects and every week for a significant
change to occur”.
T10: “The students are much more independent learners, it established more
the learning habits, the learning in pairs exposed the children to the student
with whom I had less contact and this created new friendships and
connections, the learning in groups accustomed them to work together, the
clear rules that get along in the group greatly advanced it also in terms of
respectable discourse Among them and especially on a better climate”.
One of the teachers (T5) indicated that she did not feel any change in her class, and
another teacher (T3) did not participate in the intervention due to maternity leave.
DIGILEC Revista Internacional de Lenguas y Culturas 31
Digilec 12 (2025), pp. 20-40
Q3. How did the “El Hasade” method affect students’ abilities and motivation? You
can talk about struggling students separately and excelling students separately, and
of course also about the mass of average students.
T6: “The struggling students in a regular class do not cooperate. In this class
you work and participate actively. Of course, each at his own level”.
T4: “I think that both strong and weak got a chance to prove themselves, their
self-confidence increased in the way they approach the task, and this had a
good effect on the weak students by being able to finish tasks in the class and
feeling that they were an inseparable part of the class - a direct continuation
of the breaks that exposed them to new friends. And for the strong students,
the effect was that they felt they were useful and helping their friends - peer
learning”.
One of the teachers declared that she failed and explained the reasons why:
T3: “It is very difficult to apply the method in my class, there are many
emotional and behavioural difficulties that make meaningful learning
extremely difficult. Yet, I wasn’t consistent and whenever it was too difficult,
I went back to regular teaching”.
Q4: Explain whether there is a change in students’ motivation when “El Hasade” is
operated in the classroom:
Except 2 teachers, all other 8 stated an increase in students' motivation and added:
T7: “It was very helpful for the weak children to work with strong ones, and
it seems that they cooperated in the lessons. Sometimes, the powerful had to
wait for the struggling friend and sometimes showed impatience”.
T9: “(The students were) Highly motivated. The rationale for dividing the
pairs according to strong is very important. The strong students, on the one
hand, learned and developed additional abilities and, on the other hand, dealt
with the values of others. On the one hand, the weak felt trusted, but on the
other hand, they developed a capacity for independence and peer learning,
which is often more beneficial than any teacher”.
T10: “I feel that this is where a struggling student found himself in much more
than a frontal lesson in language classes. At the stations where he could
perform tasks, he was busy working and experiencing successes”.
Q5: Do you have any additional insights from the “El Hasade” method that you can
share here?
Some of the teachers remarked the following insights they had along the year:
T3: “You need patience, constant exposure to the children and daily
practice”.
T4: “That the learning materials will be ready and there will be no need to
prepare them because it takes much time to prepare them.”
T5: “A method that requires preparation in class, it is advisable to discuss in
plenary before starting to work that way”.
DIGILEC Revista Internacional de Lenguas y Culturas 32
Digilec 12 (2025), pp. 20-40
Q6: Can you say if the implementation of the PACE method was effective for your
students?
Participants had expressed their content from the instructor which guided them
throughout the year:
T7: “In my opinion, this method is very successful in all aspects, it led me
believe in so many students I felt I lost before applying El Hasade”.
T9: “The ability to reach all the students in a two-hour lesson is wonderful
and accurate in my opinion. It is important for me to say that the joy of
learning the method and the constant pushing not to be afraid and to believe
in it came to me from dear Orly (the instructor), we opened and solved
everything complex together. She knows how to wrap and do it perfectly. She
has a big part in our success!!! Love her very much!”.
T10: “Yes! that we won Orly (the instructor) and there is nothing like it! We
were skeptical about everything related to the method and she came to us very
patiently. Always available and ready to help both in her free time and when
we went through observation and supervision classes… that made the whole
experience for both us and the students so meaningful.”
5. DISCUSSION
El Hasade (PACE) is a new approach that connects learning to sensory, emotional,
and social systems in ways that allow students to mobilize personal and joint forces in
language acquisition. In the present study, we strained to show that the approach, which
combines these methodologies, provides answers to students on three levels: cognitive
(presented by achievements), emotional (presented by motivation) and social (presented
by teachers' testimonials on classroom climate). For this purpose, a study has been
conducted in six classes: three third-grade classes (with one of them being the control
group), two fourth-grade classes, and one fifth-grade class. Three Israeli Jewish
populations have been examined: Two classes of new immigrants (coming mainly from
Russia, Asia, and Sudan), one old Israeli secular class in a high socioeconomic area, and
one class in a religious Jewish school in a relatively low socioeconomic area. The sixth
classroom was a third-grade class in a school where intervention was carried out, except
for this class due to the teacher's maternity leave, so it served as the control group.
The International Index for the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study
(PIRLS) (Martin et al., 2007) on literacy includes four levels: low (locating and retrieving
information), intermediate (making simple references), high (making inferences and
interpretations with text-based support) and advanced (integrating ideas and information
across texts to provide reasons and explanations) (Mullis et al., 2012). Improving literacy
skills is important in every country. Learning at an early age (5-7 years) is of crucial
importance since, according to Myrberg (2007), children who are left behind in early
years, the development of reading and writing encounter considerable difficulties in
following education later as the texts become longer and more complicated. Our research
DIGILEC Revista Internacional de Lenguas y Culturas 33
Digilec 12 (2025), pp. 20-40
showed that the highest changes in grades were in the third grades of the immigrant
children (97.45% and 55.77% respectively), in the fourth grades the percentage of change
was 18.75% and 52.94%) and finally, the percentage of change was in the fifth grade -
and it was 20.13%. This is a small sample, and it will be interesting to test this on a larger
scale and in a wider range (from first grade to sixth grade for example) to get numbers
that verify the literature. Simultaneously, there is a connection between learning at a
younger age and the percentage of improvement in grades.
As mentioned earlier, the innovation in this study is the addition of the cognitive
dimension to social-emotional learning (CSEL). As mentioned, SEL is a process of
developing self-awareness, self-control, and interpersonal skills essential for success in
school, work, and life (Paolini, 2020). People with strong social-emotional skills can
better cope with daily challenges and benefit academically, professionally, and socially
(UNICEF, 2023). This research expression is validated in the semi-structured
questionnaire conducted among 10 participating teachers, one of whom (T4) claimed:
“The method had an effect in that the children learned to take care of each other during
work and continued to the rest of the lessons and breaks, they learned in a different, more
independent and diverse way. To this, T9 added that: "The method made the students
much more independent, learn, think, cope and above all the ability they are capable of".
Emotional intelligence is critical to academic success and linked to improved
educational outcomes, including higher grades and standardized test scores. In an
elementary school setting, emotional learning can help students better understand and
regulate their emotions, leading to improved focus and attention in the classroom (Carter
et al., 2004). T9 said that “there is a high motivation. The rationale for dividing the pairs
according to strong-weak is fundamental. The strong students on the one hand learned
and developed additional abilities and on the other hand dealt with the values of others.
The weak on the one hand felt trusted but on the other hand developed the ability to be
independent and learn Peers who are often more helpful than any teacher.” T10 added
that: “I feel that this is where a struggling student found himself in much more than a
frontal lesson in language classes. At the stations where he could perform tasks, he was
busy, worked and experienced successes. Regarding an outstanding student, this is the
place where there was an opportunity to empower him, he would get a partner who
needed more help, and I would explain to him individually that I believe in him and what
I expect from him. Of course, if there was a difficulty then we would change, and it really
worked. I have no doubt that the students’ grades are completely related to the form of
learning itself.”
An early study (Caprara et al., 2011) showed that SEL is a comprehensive and
integrated approach to education that combines the strengths of learning to promote
student success. It is considered a predictor of learning abilities in children and young
adults' early and late learning stages. Later studies (such as Bener et al., 2022) showed
that students who are exposed to social and emotional learning methods (without the
cognitive component that will be emphasized in this work) tend to get better academic
results, including improved linguistic, scientific, and mathematical literacy. This
approach can be particularly beneficial for students in primary schools, where basic skills
are developed. This was confirmed by T9, who stated: “The changes in the grades
DIGILEC Revista Internacional de Lenguas y Culturas 34
Digilec 12 (2025), pp. 20-40
surprised them; they were very excited to see the large differences between the grades of
December 22 and the grades of May 23, since there was not one student who did not
improve his grades, even if he started with a very minimal grade. The outstanding ones
also improved but, in any case, the range of their change was smaller.” T8 even
mentioned that she was excited to see special education children succeeding in the regular
exam without difficulty”.
As mentioned, the Hebrew language scores of the schools that participated in the
study increased on average from 20% in the school with the Native Hebrew speaking
population whose socioeconomic status score is very high, to 97% in the school of new
immigrants from a very low socioeconomic average. We discovered, interestingly, that
there is an inverse relationship between the school’s socioeconomic average and the
percentage of change in the scores of participating students, that is, the higher the
socioeconomic average, the lower the percentage of improvement and vice versa (see
table 1 the differences between scores from school 1 (new immigrants) and school 3
(native Hebrew speakers). This study assumes that the reasons are diverse and tend to
stem from a lack of motivation among strong schools where there is access to private
tutoring and external assistance from the parents (not from the teachers and students, but
systemically). Also, other reasons can emerge from the starting point of a school for
immigrant children when the averages started at about 40 out of 100 and ended at 89 out
of 100. The ability to improve is more significant than a school that started with an
average score of 60. Nevertheless, the achievements of the "strong” schools did not reach
the achievements of the "weak" schools, which were characterized by weak populations
and new immigrant students for several assumed reasons.
Social learning is another important aspect of the integrative method examined in
this study. Social learning refers to the process by which students learn from peers
(Hortigüela Alcalá et al., 2019). In an elementary school setting, social learning can take
many forms, including cooperative learning, peer teaching, and group projects (WGU–-
Western Governors University, 2020). The teachers participating in this research
mentioned three significant changes that occurred in their classrooms with the change in
the learning method: Change no. T4: 1) The method affected the children in the way that
they learned to take care of each other during work. This continued for the rest of the
lessons and breaks as well”. 2) T7: “The children spoke in the ‘language’ of El Hasade,
in the special terms of cooperation that help in the climate change in the classroom”. 3)
T10: “The students reduced their dependence on us, the teachers, and solved problems
on their own using higher social resources”. These findings concur with the literature of
peer teaching, problem solving together and cooperation (Mitsea, Drigas, & Mantas,
2021). By working with others, students can develop critical social skills, such as
communication, collaboration, and problem solving, that are essential for success in
school and beyond (Carpenter et al., 2010a). T7 (a 5th grade teacher) stated that: “Students
learn independently, in a very significant way, this established their learning habits more,
learning in pairs exposed the children to a student with whom I had less contact and this
created new friendships and connections, learning in groups accustomed them to working
together, the rules The fact that they get along well in the group has promoted it a lot also
DIGILEC Revista Internacional de Lenguas y Culturas 35
Digilec 12 (2025), pp. 20-40
in terms of the respectful discourse between them and especially about a better climate
that was created in other lessons and even during breaks.
Cognitive learning is an important component in various studies (Carpenter et al.,
2010a). This approach to education recognizes that students learn best when they are
actively involved in the learning process. In an elementary school setting, this may
involve hands-on-experiential learning and activities that allow students to apply what
they have learned in real-world contexts. For example, students may engage in scientific
experiments, mathematical problem-solving activities, or linguistic challenges that
require them to think critically and creatively (Voskoglou & Buckley, 2012). Thus,
engaging children in sensory and motor activities such as drawing, writing, and physical
activities can improve their cognitive abilities, including language and literacy. These
activities stimulate the brain and improve hand-eye coordination, essential for writing and
reading. In addition, by participating in these activities, children can develop their
attention, memory, and problem-solving skills, which are fundamental to language and
literacy acquisition. T8 stated that: “particularly weak children, who did not hold a pen
in their hand throughout the year, began to participate actively, showed interest, ability
and their achievements improved miraculously”. T1 (3rd grade teacher of new immigrant
children) said that the student of the combined class (special education) got a score of 80
in the regular language test, which was not adapted for children in special education. The
teachers of the fourth grade (T6 and T8), who are required to teach the children for the
national exam during 3 consecutive months, described that T8: “the method created a
higher ability of concentration among the children, the method of moving between the
stations, the change in tasks from station to station, and the need to work in an orderly
manner, helped the students to concentrate over time and perform complex tasks that they
could not perform in a normal face-to-face class.”
Promoting sensory and motor skills may have a significant impact on the
development of language and literacy skills in elementary school children (Bataglia et al.,
2020). Furthermore, sensory activities, such as playing with toys, touching textures, and
exploring the environment, can help children develop their sensory perception and
memory skills, which are essential for language and literacy acquisition (Greven et al.,
2019). By engaging in sensory experiences, children can learn to recognize and remember
words and concepts and make connections between the physical world and language.
Similarly, motor activities such as drawing, writing, and physical activity can help
children develop the fine motor skills required for writing and reading. Hand-eye
coordination, dexterity, and muscle control are all essential to writing letters and words
legibly and following lines of text while reading. Physical activity can also help develop
attention, memory, and problem-solving skills, which are important for language and
literacy acquisition (Bataglia et al., 2020). Five of the participating teachers (T7, T9, T8,
T5 & T1) stated that the games, tools and devices given to the children for learning at the
stations, the use of plasticine, and the materials that required the children to touch, feel
and create, helped them develop memory, retrieval and retrieval of new words.
Finally, the PACE method emphasizes the importance of a supportive learning
environment. This can include a positive and inclusive school culture as well as effective
classroom management strategies that promote student engagement and motivation and
DIGILEC Revista Internacional de Lenguas y Culturas 36
Digilec 12 (2025), pp. 20-40
this is consistent with the research of Carpenter et al. (2010b). By creating a supportive
learning environment, teachers can help students feel valued and respected, leading to
improved academic outcomes, including improved language, science and math literacy.
PACE combined the cognitive dimension with the familiar social emotional learning in a
new way and connected three dimensions in the students (CESL) while giving brain tools
and emotional and social support in the form of friends, classroom climate, and tools for
an educational classroom culture. This approach is fundamental and comprehensive to
education in the field of linguistic literacy and has a positive effect on linguistic literacy
among students in elementary schools. By blending cognitive, emotional, and social
learning strengths, CESL, as this study performed the integration, can help students
develop the foundational skills they need to succeed in school and beyond (OECD, 2021).
As for critical reviews about the SEL method in the US, this research wishes to
point out the attention towards Is and Matters (2019) research that provides a critical
perspective on the trends in the field of Social Emotional Learning (SEL) in the United
States. The authors discuss how SEL has become a major emphasis in American
education since the early 1990s, with numerous programs and initiatives focused on
enhancing emotional skills and competencies among students. This article highlights the
tension between the stated ideals of SEL, such as promoting caring, community, and
diversity, and the actual practices employed in many programs. It argues that while SEL
aims to address social and emotional needs in educational settings, it often prioritizes
individualistic models of self and focuses on controlling emotions and behaviors. This
narrow focus may undermine the broader goals of building caring and inclusive classroom
environments. Our research shows the extreme opposite results, that is, how the new
CSEL integrative method emphasizes collaboration, team playing, and peer teaching in
order not to promote some students on the expense of others, thus pairing all students as
heterogenic couples according to Judaism ancient method “Hevruta” (meaning friends
working together) so peer studying, mutual fertilizing and joint efforts increases both
strong and week students in the “Hevruta” as in the group they are jointed. Is and Matters
(2019) also point out the lack of clarity and conceptual confusion surrounding SEL, as
the term is used to encompass a wide range of programs with different approaches.
Moreover, there is ongoing debate and skepticism about the effectiveness of SEL
programs, with some studies lacking rigorous evaluation methods. The research
conducted here is three-level research combining numeral results of all classroom
students and teachers’ testimonials reflecting two defined qualitive outcomes such as self-
motivation regarding emotional learning and classroom climate that expresses social
learning.
The hereby research "Engaging in a reactive response to this critique, thereby
succumbing to the article's manoeuvre" the author of this research conducted it in
different classroom environments as mentioned before in order to overcome the cultural
biases mentioned and dares to suggest the combined method of CSEL and its defined
measurements proposed here (achievements, self-motivation and classroom climate) as a
unified practice for performing SEL optimally.
DIGILEC Revista Internacional de Lenguas y Culturas 37
Digilec 12 (2025), pp. 20-40
6. CONCLUSION
Finally, the PACE method emphasizes the importance of a supportive learning
environment. This can include a positive and inclusive school culture as well as effective
classroom management strategies that promote student engagement and motivation and
this is consistent with the research of Carpenter et al. (2010b). By creating a supportive
learning environment, teachers can help students feel valued and respected, leading to
improved academic outcomes, including improved language, science and math literacy.
PACE combined the cognitive dimension with the familiar social emotional learning in a
new way and connected three dimensions in the students (CESL) while giving brain tools
and emotional and social support in the form of friends, classroom climate, and tools for
an educational classroom culture. This approach is fundamental and comprehensive to
education in the field of linguistic literacy and has a positive effect on linguistic literacy
among students in elementary schools. By blending cognitive, emotional, and social
learning strengths, CESL, as this study performed the integration, can help students
develop the foundational skills they need to succeed in school and beyond (OECD, 2021).
The hereby research "Engaging in a reactive response to this critique, thereby
succumbing to the article's maneuver" the author of this research conducted it in different
classroom environments as mentioned before in order to overcome the cultural biases
mentioned and dares to suggest the combined method of CSEL and its defined
measurements proposed here (achievements, self-motivation and classroom climate) as a
unified practice for performing SEL optimally.
7. LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
The following limitations have been identified for this study.
To the best knowledge of authors, the only valid incorporated questionnaire
analyzing social and emotional traits in children so far is “Ages and Stages” (Squires &
Twombly, 2002), but it is limited to pre-schoolers. A literature review has shown that
most researchers use this questionnaire also in elementary schools (e.g., Carter et al.,
2004).
Until now, social-emotional learning questionnaires have been suitable for children
up to the age of five. As such, an inclusive questionnaire is not found for school-age
children, so this has been used for this research.
Due to space limitations on the journal, the current study will not include the
examination of the mathematical and science literacies after the intervention of this
method in schools. Therefore, we will focus exclusively on the examination of the
changes in the linguistic literacy of the students, which will allow researchers to examine
the mathematical and scientific literacy in future studies. Moreover, a cognitive
questionnaire will be found later.
Also, only three sectors in the State of Israel will be examined: 1) Secular Israeli
Jewish students; 2) religious Israeli Jews; and 3) Israeli Jews children of immigrants.
Children with special needs, special populations, or children with special lip difficulties
DIGILEC Revista Internacional de Lenguas y Culturas 38
Digilec 12 (2025), pp. 20-40
will not be tested, nor will we study Arab schools, all due to a lack of sufficient research
data.
The interviews were conducted only with teachers due to the age of the participant
children.
8. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author would like to express sincere gratitude to the schools that participated
in this research, allowing access to their classrooms and educational data. Special
appreciation goes to all teachers who implemented the El Hasade (PACE) method and
generously shared their experiences and observations through interviews. The author is
particularly indebted to Dr. Elena Parra Gomez, whose guidance, expertise, and
mentorship were instrumental throughout the research process. Without her invaluable
supervision and support, this study would not have been possible. Additionally, thanks to
the instructors who assisted with the implementation of the method in various classroom
settings.
9. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The author declares no conflict of interest that could have influenced the research
findings presented in this study.
10. FUNDING
This research received no external funding. The study was conducted independently
by the author without financial support from any funding agency, commercial, or not-for-
profit organization.
REFERENCES
Ahonen, A. K. (2021). Finland: Success through equity—The trajectories in PISA
performance. In N. Crato (Ed.), Improving a country's education: PISA 2018 results
in 10 countries (pp. 121136). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59031-
4_6
Battaglia, G., Giustino, V., Tabacchi, G., Alesi, M., Galassi, C., Modica, C., Bellafiore,
M., Bianco, A., & Palma, A. (2020). Effectiveness of a physical education program
on preschoolers' motor and pre-literacy skills from the training-to-health project: A
focus on weight status. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 2, Article
579421. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.579421
Benner, G. J., Strycker, L. A., Pennefather, J., & Smith, J. L. M. (2022). Improving
literacy for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: An innovative
DIGILEC Revista Internacional de Lenguas y Culturas 39
Digilec 12 (2025), pp. 20-40
approach. Teacher Education and Special Education, 45(4), 331–
348. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064211060878
Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2011).
The contribution of personality traits and self‐efficacy beliefs to academic
achievement: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology,
81(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1348/2044-8279.002004
Carpenter, T. P., & Franke, M. L. (2010a). Cognitively guided instruction in early
mathematics education: An exploratory study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher
Education, 13(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9124-1
Carpenter, T. P., & Franke, M. L. (2010b). Supporting English language learners in
mathematics classrooms. Teaching Children Mathematics, 16(8), 476–
483. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.16.8.0476
Carter, A. S., Briggs‐Gowan, M. J., & Davis, N. O. (2004). Assessment of young
children's social‐emotional development and psychopathology: Recent advances
and recommendations for practice. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,
45(1), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00316.x
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing
among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Genlott, A. A., & Grönlund, Å. (2013). Improving literacy skills through learning reading
by writing: The iWTR method presented and tested. Computers & Education, 67,
98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.03.007
Greven, C. U., Lionetti, F., Booth, C., Aron, E. N., Fox, E., Schendan, H. E., Pluess, M.,
Bruining, H., Acevedo, B., Bijttebier, P., & Homberg, J. (2019). Sensory processing
sensitivity in the context of environmental sensitivity: A critical review and
development of research agenda. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 98, 287–
305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.01.009
Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Hernando-Garijo, A., Pérez-Pueyo, Á., & Fernández-Río, J.
(2019). Cooperative learning and students' motivation, social interactions and
attitudes: Perspectives from two different educational stages. Sustainability,
11(24), Article 7005. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247005
Kraus, N., & White-Schwoch, T. (2015). Unraveling the biology of auditory learning: A
cognitive-sensorimotor-reward framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(11),
642–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.017
Mitsea, E., Drigas, A., & Mantas, P. (2021). Soft skills & metacognition as inclusion
amplifiers in the 21st century. International Journal of Online & Biomedical
Engineering, 17(4), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v17i04.21281
Myrberg, E. (2007). The effect of formal teacher education on reading achievement of
3rd‐grade students in public and independent schools in Sweden. Educational
Studies, 33(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690601068311
Official documentation and reports
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Kennedy, A. M. (2007). Progress in International
Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS): PIRLS 2006 technical report. International
Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
DIGILEC Revista Internacional de Lenguas y Culturas 40
Digilec 12 (2025), pp. 20-40
Ministry of Education. (2023). National assessment results for elementary education in
Israel 2022–2023. Israel Ministry of Education.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Drucker, K. T. (2012). PIRLS 2011
international results in reading. International Association for the Evaluation of
Educational Achievement.
OECD. (2021). Beyond academic learning: First results from the social and emotional
skills survey. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/92a11084-en
Paolini, A. C. (2020). Social emotional learning: Key to career readiness. Anatolian
Journal of Education, 5(1), 125–134.
Sands, D., Trudeau, N., & Bryson, S. E. (2015). Sensory play and language development
in young children. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 13(2), 143–
153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X14548783
Squires, J., & Twombly, E. (2002). Ages & stages questionnaires: Social-emotional. Paul
H. Brookes Publishing.
Voskoglou, M. G., & Buckley, S. (2012). Problem-solving and computational thinking
in a learning environment. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1212.0750
UNICEF. (2023). Social and emotional learning in education. United Nations Children's
Fund.
Western Governors University. (2020, May 7). How social learning theory works in
education. https://www.wgu.edu/blog/guide-social-learning-theory-
education2005.html