Contenido principal del artículo

Bedriye Karaman
Pamukkale University
Turquía
Yunus Arslan
Pamukkale University
Turquía
Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2023), Experiencias didácticas, Páginas 413-438
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17979/sportis.2023.9.2.9494
Recibido: ene. 24, 2023 Aceptado: abr. 11, 2023 Publicado: may. 1, 2023
Cómo citar

Resumen

Parece inevitable que la tecnología en desarrollo se integre en el campo de la educación. La aplicación de Flipped Learning (FL) , que incluye un componente tecnológico, a la educación física nos permitirá comprender mejor los reflejos del enfoque en el curso. El objetivo de este estudio es examinar el efecto de FL en el conocimiento, la motivación y el desarrollo de habilidades de los estudiantes en educación física. Se utilizó un diseño de grupo de control apareado pretest-postest. Los participantes, cuya media de edad es 14,5±1,0, son 62 estudiantes de secundaria que acaban de comenzar su escuela, incluidos 32 experimentales (11 niños, 21 niñas), 30 de control (10 niños, 20 niñas). De acuerdo con los hallazgos, la FL utilizada en educación física incrementó el conocimiento (Z= -4.18, p= .00) y la motivación de los estudiantes (λ de Wilks= .16, F(1, 60)= 55.60, p= .00, η2 = .83). Por otro lado, el desarrollo de la habilidad en voleibol tuvo un efecto solo en la habilidad técnica de pase (M= 3.00, Sd= 1.07; p< .05). En conclusión, este estudio proporciona alguna evidencia de que FL es un factor importante que influye en el conocimiento del contenido de voleibol de los estudiantes en educación física y puede ayudar a motivarlos a participar en clase. Se necesitan más estudios para probar el efecto de FL en el desarrollo de habilidades en educación física.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Citas

Adams, C., & Dove, A. (2018). Calculus Students Flipped Out: The Impact of Flipped Learning on Calculus Students’ Achievement and Perceptions of Learning. PRIMUS. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2017.1332701

Autapao, K., & Minwong, P. (2018). Effects of basic character design and animation concepts using the flipped learning and project-based learning approach on learning achievement and creative thinking of higher education students. AIP Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5019494

Bergmann, J. & Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. In International Society for Technology in Education.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Erkan Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2019). Eğitimde Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. In Pegem Akademi.

Casey, A., & Jones, B. (2011). Using digital technology to enhance student engagement in physical education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 2(2), 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/18377122.2011.9730351

Chen, R. J. (2010). Investigating models for preservice teachers’ use of technology to support student-centered learning. Computers & Education, 55(1), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.015

Chiang, T. H.-C., Yang, S. J. H. & Yin, C. (2018). Effect of gender differences on 3-on-3 basketball games taught in a mobile flipped classroom. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1495652.

Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Içinde Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

Demirer, V. & Aydın, B. (2017). Ters Yüz Sınıf Modeli Çerçevesinde Gerçekleştirilmiş Çalışmalara Bir Bakış: İçerik Analizi. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.288488

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N.E. & Hyun, H. H. (2011). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education: Quantitative Research Methodologies. New York, McGraw-Hill.

Gabbett, T. J. & Georgieff, B. (2006). The development of a standardized skill assessment for junior volleyball players. International journal of sports physiology and performance. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.1.2.95

Hrastinski, S., & Ekman Rising, M. (2020). Communities, networks and ICT professional development across schools in close physical proximity. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(2), 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1733062

Hwang, G.J., Lai, C.L. & Wang, S.Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: a mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0043-0

Karaman, B. & Arslan, Y. (2019). Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Dersi Ters-Yüz Öğrenme Hazırbulunuşluk Ölçeğinin Piskometrik Özelliklerinin Ortaöğretim Öğrencileri için İncelenmesi. 17th International Sports Sciences Congress, 13-16 November, Aska Hotel, Antalya.

Kavanagh, L., Reidsema, C., McCredden, J., & Smith, N. (2017). Design considerations. In The flipped classroom (pp. 15-35). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3413-8_2

Lin, Y. N., Hsia, L. H. & Hwang, G. J. (2021). Promoting pre-class guidance and in-class reflection: A SQIRC-based mobile flipped learning approach to promoting students’ billiards skills, strategies, motivation and self-efficacy. Computers and Education, 160, 104035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104035

Lonsdale, C., Hodge, K., & Rose, E. A. (2008). The Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire (BRSQ): Instrument development and initial validity evidence. Journal of sport and exercise psychology, 30(3), 323-355. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.30.3.323

Love, B., Hodge, A., Grandgenett, N. & Swift, A.W. (2013). Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 45, 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.822582

Muir, T. & Geiger, V. (2015). The affordances of using a flipped classroom approach in the teaching of mathematics: a case study of a grade 10 mathematics class. Mathematics https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0165-8

Ntoumanis, N. & Standage, M. (2009). Morality in sport: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200903036040

Østerlie, O. & Kjelaas, I. (2019). The perception of adolescents’ encounter with a flipped learning intervention in Norwegian physical education. Frontiers in Education. 4, 114. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00114

Østerlie, O. & Mehus, I. (2020). The impact of flipped learning on cognitive knowledge learning and intrinsic motivation in norwegian secondary physical education. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10040110

Østerlie, O. (2020). Flipped learning in physical education. A gateway to motivation and (deep) learning. NTNU. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2649972

Østerlie, O., Sargent, J., Killian, C., Garcia-Jaen, M., García-Martínez, S. & Ferriz-Valero, A. (2022). Flipped learning in physical education: A scoping review. European Physical Education Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X221120939

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816

Ratheeswari, K. (2018). Information communication technology in education. Journal of Applied and Advanced research, 3(1), 45-47. https://doi.org/10.21839/jaar.2018.v3iS1.169

Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L. & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The Flipped Classroom: An Opportunity To Engage Millennial Students Through Active Learning Strategies. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences.

Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation. Içinde Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness, 8, 179-215. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806

Sargent, J. & Casey, A. (2019). Flipped learning, pedagogy and digital technology: Establishing consistent practice to optimise lesson time. European Physical Education Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X19826603

Sarrazin, P., Appleton, P., Ramis, Y., Gobbi, E., Erturan G., Krommidas, K., Holzweg, M., Papaioannou. (2019). Construct validity and measurement equivalence of the IMPACT project measure.15th European Congress of Sport & Exercise Psychology, Münster, Germany.

Schutz, R. W., Gessaroli, M. E., Singer, R., Murphey, M., & Tennant, L. (1993). Use, misuse, and disuse of psychometrics in sport psychology research. Handbook of research on sport psychology, 901-917.Staker, H. & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 Blended Learning. Innosight Institute.

Sumadyo, M., Santoso, H. B., Sensuse, D. I., & Suhartanto, H. (2021). Metacognıtıve Aspects Influencıng Help-Seekıng Behavıor On Collaboratıve Onlıne Learnıng Envıronment: A Systematıc Lıterature Revıew. Journal of Educators Online, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2021.18.3.10

Trout, J. (2013). Digital Movement Analysis in Physical Education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2013.818394

Tucker, B. (2012). The Flipped Classroom: Online instruction at home frees class time for learning. Education Next.

Yüksel, Y. (2014). Voleybol Öğretiminde Web Sitesi ve Web Günlüğü Kullanımının Erişi ve İnternete Yönelik Tutuma Etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Zhao, D. & Kang, H. L. (2020). Practice exploration of flipping classroom in table tennis club in the informatization age. Procedia Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.02.044

Pang, B., Varea, V., Cavallin, S. & Cupac, A. (2019). Experiencing risk, surveillance, and prosumption: health and physical education students’ perceptions of digitised health and physical activity data. Sport, Education and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2018.1491835