Main Article Content

Javier Pecci
University of Sevilla
Spain
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2842-3067
Wanessa Onetti Onetti
International University of Rioja
Spain
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8957-6182
Horacio Sanchez-Trigo
University of Sevilla
Spain
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1830-8236
Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024), Original papers, pages 14-31
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17979/sportis.2024.10.1.9956
Submitted: Oct 3, 2023 Accepted: Nov 7, 2023 Published: Jan 1, 2024
How to Cite

Abstract

Virtual education has evolved significantly, driven by the integration of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) resources, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Sciences, with their practical components, present unique challenges in virtual education, including maintaining student engagement. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the flipped learning methodology with and without in-class content reinforcement in a virtual classroom for previously assimilated materials within Health Sciences. The study involved students in a Kinesiology program using the Blackboard Learn platform. Two groups were established: one completing a questionnaire at the beginning of the virtual class (FLI group) and the other at the end following a content reinforcement session (FLI+TRA group). While no statistically significant score differences were found between the two groups, the FLI+TRA group showed higher pass rates and improved average scores, indicating practical benefits. These results suggest that combining flipped learning with traditional in-class instruction can enhance content assimilation in virtual education, fostering increased student engagement and participation. However, further research is needed to explore the full implications and adaptability of this approach. In conclusion, this study highlights the potential of the FLI+TRA approach to improve learning outcomes in complex subjects like Epistemology and Research Methodology within Health Sciences. As virtual education continues to evolve, educators should consider this hybrid teaching model as a valuable tool to provide a more holistic and effective learning experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

References

Al-khresheh, M. (2021). Revisiting the effectiveness of Blackboard learning management system in teaching English in the era of COVID 19. World Journal of English Language, 12(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n1p1

Almarzooq, Z. I., Lopes, M., & Kochar, A. (2020). Virtual learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a disruptive technology in graduate medical education. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 75(20), 2635-2638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.015

Al-Samarraie, H., Shamsuddin, A., & Alzahrani, A. I. (2020). A flipped classroom model in higher education: a review of the evidence across disciplines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1017-1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09718-8

Banks, L., & Kay, R. (2022). Exploring flipped classrooms in undergraduate nursing and health science: a systematic review. Nurse Education in Practice, 103417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103417

Beluce, A. C., & Oliveira, K. L. D. (2015). Students’ motivation for learning in virtual learning environments. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 25, 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272560201513

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). EBOOK: Teaching for Quality Learning at University. McGraw-hill education (UK).

Calderón, C. (2002). Criterios de calidad en la investigación cualitativa en salud (ICS): apuntes para un debate necesario. Revista española de salud pública, 76, 473-482. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1135-57272002000500009

Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current directions in psychological science, 1(3), 98-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783

Dung, D. T. H. (2020). The advantages and disadvantages of virtual learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 10(3), 45-48.

Flores, O., Del-Arco, I., & Silva, P. (2016). The flipped classroom model at the university: analysis based on professors’ and students’ assessment in the educational field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0022-1

Halasa, S., Abusalim, N., Rayyan, M., Constantino, R. E., Nassar, O., Amre, H., ... & Qadri, I. (2020). Comparing student achievement in traditional learning with a combination of blended and flipped learning. Nursing Open, 7(4), 1129-1138. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.492

Hernández, D. J., Ortiz, J. J. G., & Abellán, M. T. (2020). Metodologías activas en la universidad y su relación con los enfoques de enseñanza. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 24(1), 76-94. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v24i1.8173

Hill, L. (2019). Blackboard Collaborate Ultra: An Online, Interactive Teaching Tool. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 18(4), 640-642. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2019.0027

Huang, Y. C., Backman, S. J., Backman, K. F., McGuire, F. A., & Moore, D. (2019). An investigation of motivation and experience in virtual learning environments: A self-determination theory. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 591-611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9784-5

Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L., & Wang, S. Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: a mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of computers in education, 2, 449-473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0043-0

Isaza Restrepo, A. (2005). Clases magistrales versus actividades participativas en el pregrado de medicina. De la teoría a la evidencia. Revista de estudios sociales, (20), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.7440/res20.2005.05

Jordán Lluch, C., Pérez Peñalver, M. J., & Sanabria Codesal, E. (2014). Investigación del impacto en un aula de matemáticas al utilizar flip education. Pensamiento matemático, 4(2), 9-22.

Kurbakova, S., Volkova, Z., & Kurbakov, A. (2020, July). Virtual learning and educational environment: New opportunities and challenges under the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2020 The 4th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology (pp. 167-171). https://doi.org/10.1145/3416797.3416838

Labrador, M., & Andreu, M. D. (2008). Metodologías activas. València: Editorial de la UPV.

McCue, T. J. (2019, July 31). E learning climbing to $325 billion by 2025 UF Canvas absorb Schoology Moodle. Forbes

McLean, S., Attardi, S. M., Faden, L., & Goldszmidt, M. (2016). Flipped classrooms and student learning: not just surface gains. Advances in physiology education. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00098.2015

Mercado López, E. P. (2020). Limitaciones en el uso del aula invertida en la educación superior. Revista Transdigital, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.56162/transdigital13

Morell, T. (2004). La interacción en la clase magistral. España.

Pozo-Sanchez, S., Lopez Belmonte, J., Moreno Guerrero, A. J., & Lopez Nunez, J. A. (2019). Impact of educational stage in the application of flipped learning: A contrasting analysis with traditional teaching. Sustainability, 11(21), 5968. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215968

Ramírez, D., Hinojosa, C., & Rodríguez, F. (2014). Advantages and disadvantages of flipped classroom: stem students'perception. In ICERI2014 Proceedings (pp. 121-127). IATED.

Raza, S. A., Qazi, Z., Qazi, W., & Ahmed, M. (2022). E-learning in higher education during COVID-19: evidence from blackboard learning system. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(4), 1603-1622. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-02-2021-0054

Rubio Hernández, F. J., & Olivo-Franco, J. L. (2020). Dificultades del profesorado en sus funciones docentes y posibles soluciones. Un estudio descriptivo actualizado. Ciencia y Educación, 4(2), 7-25. https://doi.org/10.22206/cyed.2020.v4i2.pp7-25

Spante, M., Hashemi, S. S., Lundin, M., & Algers, A. (2018). Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: Systematic review of concept use. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1519143. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1519143

Tabera Galván, M. V., Álvarez Comino, M. J., Hernando Jerez, A., & Rubio Alonso, M. (2015). Percepción de los estudiantes universitarios de Ciencias de la Salud sobre las actitudes de los docentes y su influencia en el clima de aprendizaje. Revista Complutense de Educación. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RCED.2015.v26.n2.43028

Torres Martín, C., Acal, C., El Homrani, M., & Mingorance Estrada, Á. C. (2021). Impact on the virtual learning environment due to COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(2), 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020582

Yean, L. S. (2019). Promoting active learning and independent learning among primary school students using flipped classroom. International Journal of Education, 4(30), 324-341.