Cognitive Social Emotional Learning (CSEL) as an integrated tool to improve linguistic mother tongue and literacy among children in elmentary schools
Contenu de l'article principal
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.17979/digilec.2025.12.11604Résumé
The El Hasade approach (Precision, Articulation, Conception, Enhancing vocabulary; PACE in English) represents a comprehensive methodology integrating cognitive, emotional, and social dimensions to enhance linguistic literacy among elementary school students. This multidimensional approach provides foundational skills that support both academic achievement and personal development. Study findings highlight the critical importance of early-age learning experiences in determining students' future educational outcomes. The Cognitive, Social, and Emotional Learning (CSEL) intervention demonstrated significant effectiveness in fostering student independence, adaptability in learning approaches, and improved coping mechanisms.
PACE methodology acknowledges the insufficiency of social-emotional learning (SEL) alone for maximizing classroom academic performance. While SEL remains widespread throughout American and European educational systems, PACE introduces an innovative dimension—metacognition—that guides student in effective learning strategies, alternative thinking patterns, and higher-order thinking skills. This metacognitive emphasis distinguishes PACE from traditional SEL approaches by equipping students with comprehensive cognitive capabilities essential for academic success.
Research confirms emotional intelligence as a fundamental determinant of academic achievement. Social learning components, including cooperative activities and group projects, have proven instrumental in developing interpersonal competencies and fostering positive classroom environments. Concurrently, cognitive learning incorporating sensory-motor activities has demonstrably enhanced students' mental capabilities, particularly in language acquisition and literacy development. The El Hasade approach aligns with established literature while providing a holistic framework for elementary language acquisition. Although current findings support PACE effectiveness, expanded research encompassing larger populations across diverse grade levels would provide additional validation and deeper insights.
Détails de l'article
Références
Ahonen, A. K. (2021). Finland: Success through equity—The trajectories in PISA performance. In N. Crato (Ed.), Improving a country's education: PISA 2018 results in 10 countries (pp. 121–136). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59031-4_6
Battaglia, G., Giustino, V., Tabacchi, G., Alesi, M., Galassi, C., Modica, C., Bellafiore, M., Bianco, A., & Palma, A. (2020). Effectiveness of a physical education program on preschoolers' motor and pre-literacy skills from the training-to-health project: A focus on weight status. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 2, Article 579421. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.579421
Benner, G. J., Strycker, L. A., Pennefather, J., & Smith, J. L. M. (2022). Improving literacy for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: An innovative approach. Teacher Education and Special Education, 45(4), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064211060878
Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2011). The contribution of personality traits and self‐efficacy beliefs to academic achievement: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1348/2044-8279.002004
Carpenter, T. P., & Franke, M. L. (2010a). Cognitively guided instruction in early mathematics education: An exploratory study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9124-1
Carpenter, T. P., & Franke, M. L. (2010b). Supporting English language learners in mathematics classrooms. Teaching Children Mathematics, 16(8), 476–483. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.16.8.0476
Carter, A. S., Briggs‐Gowan, M. J., & Davis, N. O. (2004). Assessment of young children's social‐emotional development and psychopathology: Recent advances and recommendations for practice. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00316.x
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Genlott, A. A., & Grönlund, Å. (2013). Improving literacy skills through learning reading by writing: The iWTR method presented and tested. Computers & Education, 67, 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.03.007
Greven, C. U., Lionetti, F., Booth, C., Aron, E. N., Fox, E., Schendan, H. E., Pluess, M., Bruining, H., Acevedo, B., Bijttebier, P., & Homberg, J. (2019). Sensory processing sensitivity in the context of environmental sensitivity: A critical review and development of research agenda. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 98, 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.01.009
Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Hernando-Garijo, A., Pérez-Pueyo, Á., & Fernández-Río, J. (2019). Cooperative learning and students' motivation, social interactions and attitudes: Perspectives from two different educational stages. Sustainability, 11(24), Article 7005. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247005
Kraus, N., & White-Schwoch, T. (2015). Unraveling the biology of auditory learning: A cognitive-sensorimotor-reward framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(11), 642–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.017
Mitsea, E., Drigas, A., & Mantas, P. (2021). Soft skills & metacognition as inclusion amplifiers in the 21st century. International Journal of Online & Biomedical Engineering, 17(4), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v17i04.21281
Myrberg, E. (2007). The effect of formal teacher education on reading achievement of 3rd‐grade students in public and independent schools in Sweden. Educational Studies, 33(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690601068311
Official documentation and reports
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Kennedy, A. M. (2007). Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS): PIRLS 2006 technical report. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Ministry of Education. (2023). National assessment results for elementary education in Israel 2022–2023. Israel Ministry of Education.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Drucker, K. T. (2012). PIRLS 2011 international results in reading. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
OECD. (2021). Beyond academic learning: First results from the social and emotional skills survey. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/92a11084-en
Paolini, A. C. (2020). Social emotional learning: Key to career readiness. Anatolian Journal of Education, 5(1), 125–134.
Sands, D., Trudeau, N., & Bryson, S. E. (2015). Sensory play and language development in young children. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 13(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X14548783
Squires, J., & Twombly, E. (2002). Ages & stages questionnaires: Social-emotional. Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
Voskoglou, M. G., & Buckley, S. (2012). Problem-solving and computational thinking in a learning environment. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1212.0750
UNICEF. (2023). Social and emotional learning in education. United Nations Children's Fund.
Western Governors University. (2020, May 7). How social learning theory works in education. https://www.wgu.edu/blog/guide-social-learning-theory-education2005.html

