Bio-Inspired Attention System for Dynamic Stimulus Management in a Pet Robot

Authors

  • Jesús García-Martínez Departamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas y Automática, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Avenida de la Universidad, 30. 28911 Leganés, Madrid. España. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3615-3722
  • Arecia Segura-Bencomo Departamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas y Automática, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Avenida de la Universidad, 30. 28911 Leganés, Madrid. España. https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2804-6800
  • Marcos Maroto-Gómez Departamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas y Automática, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Avenida de la Universidad, 30. 28911 Leganés, Madrid. España. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9576-1731
  • Juan Rodríguez-Huelves Departamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas y Automática, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Avenida de la Universidad, 30. 28911 Leganés, Madrid. España. https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0133-1416
  • José Carlos Castillo Departamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas y Automática, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Avenida de la Universidad, 30. 28911 Leganés, Madrid. España. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0454-9466
  • Álvaro Castro-González Departamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas y Automática, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Avenida de la Universidad, 30. 28911 Leganés, Madrid. España. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5189-0002

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17979/ja-cea.2025.46.12063

Keywords:

Social robots, Attention, Pet robot, Multimodal system, Perception

Abstract

Pet robots are designed to promote bonding through physical contact, which makes them particularly sensitive platforms for tactile and movement stimuli. Therefore, this sensory richness can lead to overstimulation situations when multiple sensors are activated simultaneously, causing incoherent responses from the robot. This paper addresses this problem by presenting the Bio-inspired Attention System (SABi, from its initials in Spanish), a perception architecture designed to manage and prioritise stimuli dynamically in real time. The SABi is inspired by two human cognitive mechanisms: inhibition of return, which reduces the importance of previously attended stimuli, and attentional fatigue, which penalises the repeated occurrence of stimuli of the same type. This module constitutes the perception system of the Mia social robot, allowing it to select the most relevant stimulus at any given moment according to a ranking of priorities. The results of a real interaction scenario show that the SABi improves the robot’s ability to filter redundant signals and respond coherently to the affective context, favouring a more fluid and natural interaction.

References

Boksem, M. A., Tops, M., 2008. Mental fatigue: costs and benefits. Brain Research Reviews, 59(1), 125–139.

Breazeal, C., Dautenhahn, K., Kanda, T., 2016. Social robotics. Springer Handbook of Robotics, 1935–1972.

de la Cruz, A., Cabezaolías, C. M., Maroto Gómez, M., Castillo, J. C., Salichs, M. Á., 2023. Un prototipo de robot mascota para interacción con ancianos. En XLIV Jornadas de Automática. Universidade da Coruña. Servizo de Publicacións, pp. 569–574.

Desimone, R., Duncan, J., et al., 1995. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18(1), 193–222.

Goris, K., Saldien, J., Vanderniepen, I., Lefeber, D., 2009. The huggable robot Probo, a multi-disciplinary research platform. En Research and Education in Robotics—EUROBOT 2008: International Conference, Heidelberg, Germany, May 22-24, 2008. Revised Selected Papers. Springer, pp. 29–41.

Lorist, M. M., Klein, M., Nieuwenhuis, S., De Jong, R., Mulder, G., Meijman, T. F., 2000. Mental fatigue and task control: planning and preparation. Psychophysiology, 37(5), 614–625.

Nunez, E., Hirokawa, M., Suzuki, K., 2018. Design of a huggable social robot with affective expressions using projected images. Applied Sciences, 8(11). DOI: 10.3390/app8112298

Posner, M. I., Cohen, Y., et al., 1984. Components of visual orienting. Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processes, 32, 531–556.

Stiehl, W. D., Breazeal, C., Han, K.-H., Lieberman, J., Lalla, L., Maymin, A., Salinas, J., Fuentes, D., Toscano, R., Tong, C. H., et al., 2006. The Huggable: A therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch. En ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Emerging Technologies, pp. 15–es.

Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L., Marzi, C., Berlucchi, G., 1987. Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting. Neuropsychologia, 25(1), 55–71.

Wada, K., Shibata, T., 2008. Social and physiological influences of living with seal robots in an elderly care house for two months. Gerontechnology, 7(2), 235.

Warm, J. S., Parasuraman, R., Matthews, G., 2008. Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Human Factors, 50(3), 433–441.

Yan, H., Ang Jr, M. H., Poo, A. N., 2014. A survey on perception methods for human–robot interaction in social robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(1), 85–119. DOI: 10.1007/s12369-013-0199-6

Downloads

Published

2025-09-01

Issue

Section

Robótica