Applying artificial intelligence in automatic engineering education: a systematic literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17979/ja-cea.2025.46.12180Keywords:
Higher Education, Teaching, Engineering, Generative Artificial IntelligenceAbstract
The arrival of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in education has meant the beginning of a new educational revolution, generating the need to evaluate both its benefits and possible challenges in the training of future professionals. This research aims to analyze the educational experiences that have introduced this technology in higher engineering education, in order to know its integration process, its potentials and main challenges. From a systematic review of the literature, it is concluded that GenAI stands out for its ability to adapt to the characteristics of the students. However, its use in engineering education is advancing slowly, evidencing the need for effective integration into the curricula, to promote good practices and contribute to the advancement of society.
References
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Baker, J. D. (2016). The Purpose, Process, and Methods of Writing a Literature Review. AORN Journal, 103(3), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2016.01.016
Bernabei, M., Colabianchi, S., Falegnami, A., & Costantino, F. (2023). Students’ use of large language models in engineering education: A case study on technology acceptance, perceptions, efficacy, and detection chances. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5(October), 100172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100172
Bobula, M. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education: a comprehensive review of challenges, opportunities, and implications. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 30. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi30.1137
Borges, B., Foroutan, N., Bayazit, D., Sotnikova, A., Montariol, S., Nazaretzky, T., Banaei, M., Sakhaeirad, A., Servant, P., Neshaei, S. P., Frej, J., Romanou, A., Weiss, G., Mamooler, S., Chen, Z., Fan, S., Gao, S., Ismayilzada, M., Paul, D., … Bosselut, A. (2024). Could ChatGPT get an Engineering Degree? Evaluating Higher Education Vulnerability to AI Assistants. 1(49), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2414955121/-/DCSupplemental.Published
Caccavale, F., Gargalo, C. L., Gernaey, K. V., & Krühne, U. (2024). Towards Education 4.0: The role of Large Language Models as virtual tutors in chemical engineering. Education for Chemical Engineers, 49(July), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2024.07.002
Ciolacu, M. I., Marghescu, C., Mihailescu, B., & Svasta, P. (2024). Does Industry 5.0 Need an Engineering Education 5.0? Exploring Potentials and Challenges in the Age of Generative AI. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON60312.2024.10578712
Cui, Y., Chen, F., & Shiri, A. (2020). Scale up predictive models for early detection of at-risk students: a feasibility study. Information and Learning Science, 121(3–4), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-05-2019-0041
Fernández, L. R., Laura, A., Mena, F., Patricia, M., Magaña, T., Antonio, M., Magaña, R., Antonio, M., & Fernández, R. (2024). INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL EN LA EDUCACION : MODELO DE LENGUAJE DE GRAN TAMAÑO ( LLM ) COMO RECURSO EDUCATIVO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION : LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL ( LLM ) AS AN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCE. Llm, 157–164.
García-Peñalvo, F., & Vázquez-Ingelmo, A. (2023). What Do We Mean by GenAI? A Systematic Mapping of The Evolution, Trends, and Techniques Involved in Generative AI. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 8(4), 7. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2023.07.006
Garg, A., Nisumba Soodhani, K., & Rajendran, R. (2025). Enhancing data analysis and programming skills through structured prompt training: The impact of generative AI in engineering education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8(October 2024), 100380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100380
Iosup, A., & Epema, D. (2014). An experience report on using gamification in technical higher education. SIGCSE 2014 - Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2008, 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538899
Keith, M., Keiller, E., Windows-Yule, C., Kings, I., & Robbins, P. (2025). Harnessing generative AI in chemical engineering education: Implementation and evaluation of the large language model ChatGPT v3.5. Education for Chemical Engineers, 51(July 2024), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2025.01.002
King, M. R., Abdulrahman, A. M., Petrovic, M. I., Poley, P. L., Hall, S. P., Kulapatana, S., & Lamantia, Z. E. (2024). Incorporation of ChatGPT and Other Large Language Models into a Graduate Level Computational Bioengineering Course. Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, 17(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-024-00793-3
Knoth, N., Tolzin, A., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2024). AI literacy and its implications for prompt engineering strategies. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6(December 2023), 100225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100225
Menekse, M. (2023). Envisioning the future of learning and teaching engineering in the artificial intelligence era: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Engineering Education, 112(3), 578–582. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20539
Obster, F., Brand, J., Ciolacu, M., & Humpe, A. (2023). Improving Boosted Generalized Additive Models with Random Forests: A Zoo Visitor Case Study for Smart Tourism. Procedia Computer Science, 217, 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.214
Peláez-Sánchez, I. C., Velarde-Camaqui, D., & Glasserman-Morales, L. D. (2024). The impact of large language models on higher education: exploring the connection between AI and Education 4.0. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1392091
Pesovski, I., Santos, R., Henriques, R., & Trajkovik, V. (2024). Generative AI for Customizable Learning Experiences. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 16(7), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16073034
Sawalha, G., Taj, I., & Shoufan, A. (2024). Analyzing student prompts and their effect on ChatGPT’s performance. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2024.2397200
Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., Altman, D. G., Booth, A., Chan, A. W., Chang, S., Clifford, T., Dickersin, K., Egger, M., Gøtzsche, P. C., Grimshaw, J. M., Groves, T., Helfand, M., … Whitlock, E. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (prisma-p) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ (Online), 349(January), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647
Shen, Y. (2024). Future jobs: analyzing the impact of artificial intelligence on employment and its mechanisms. Economic Change and Restructuring, 57(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-024-09629-6
Soboleva, E. V., Gorev, P. M., Shadrina, N. N., & Shilova, Z. V. (2024). Using generative neural networks when training digital engineers to improve the quality of their training. Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania, 71(5), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2024.5.39
Song, T., Zhang, H., & Xiao, Y. (2024). A High-Quality Generation Approach for Educational Programming Projects Using LLM. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 2242–2255. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2024.3499751
Viveros-Muñoz, R., Carrasco-Sáez, J., Contreras-Saavedra, C., San-Martín-Quiroga, S., & Contreras-Saavedra, C. E. (2025). Does the Grammatical Structure of Prompts Influence the Responses of Generative Artificial Intelligence? An Exploratory Analysis in Spanish. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 15(7), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15073882
Wang, X., Chan, T. M., & Tamura, A. A. (2025). A learning module for generative AI literacy in a biomedical engineering classroom. Frontiers in Education, 10(March), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1551385
Yik, B. J., & Dood, A. J. (2024). ChatGPT Convincingly Explains Organic Chemistry Reaction Mechanisms Slightly Inaccurately with High Levels of Explanation Sophistication. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(5), 1836–1846. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00235
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yolanda Ceada-Garrido, Antonio Javier Barragán, Juan Manuel Enrique, Arturo Aquino, Miguel Ángel Martínez Bohórquez, José Manuel Andújar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
