Ascending the mountain: collaborative reinforcement learning between agents with opposing goals

Authors

  • Violeta Tejera-Munguía Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • Juan Jesús Roldán-Gómez Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • José Luis Jorro-Aragoneses Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17979/ja-cea.2026.47.13783

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Reinforcement Learning, Optimization

Abstract

This work explores the concept of Artificial Stupidity as a complement to Artificial Intelligence in the context of reinforcement learning. To this end, a series of experiments are conducted using the Q-Learning algorithm in the Mountain Car environment, comparing an intelligent agent with a stupid agent that exhibits opposite behaviors. Two training strategies are proposed: a reformative one, where the intelligent agent is trained from the stupid agent, and a collaborative one, where both are trained simultaneously by sharing information. The results show that incorporating information from the stupid agent improves the performance of the intelligent agent, accelerating its convergence and enhancing its overall performance.

References

Bădică, A., Bădică, C., Ivanović, M., Logofătu, D., 2022. Experiments with solving mountain car problem using state discretization and q-learning. In: Intelligent Information and Database Systems: 14th Asian Conference,

ACIIDS 2022, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, November 28–30, 2022, Proceedings, Part I. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, p. 142–155. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21743-2_12 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-21743-212

Climent, L., Longhi, A., Arbelaez, A., Mancini, M., 2024. A framework for designing reinforcement learning agents with dynamic difficulty adjustment in single-player action video games. Entertainment Computing 50, 100686. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875952124000545 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2024.100686

Economist, 1992. Artificial stupidity. The Economist 324 (7770), 14. Grollman, D. H., Billard, A., 2011. Donut as i do: Learning from failed demonstrations. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, pp. 3804–3809.

Lidén, L., 2003. Artificial stupidity: the art of intentional mistakes. Vol. 2. Charles River Media.

Moore, A.W., 1990. Efficient memory-based learning for robot control. Tech. rep., University of Cambridge.

Roldán-Gómez, J. J., 2022. Artificial Stupidity in Robotics: Something Unwanted or Somehow Useful? Lecture notes in networks and systems, 26–37. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21062-4_3DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-21062-4{3

Sutton, R. S., Barto, A. G., 11 2018. Reinforcement Learning, second edition. MIT Press.

Teja Chavali, S., Tej Kandavalli, C., Sugash, T. M., Amudha, J., 2022. Modelling a reinforcement learning agent for mountain car problem using q–learning with tabular discretization. In: 2022 IEEE 2nd Mysore Sub Section International Conference (MysuruCon). pp. 1–5. DOI: 10.1109/MysuruCon55714.2022.9972352

Watkins, C. J. C. H., Dayan, P., 5 1992. Q-learning. Vol. 8. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00992698 OI: 10.1007/bf00992698

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

Issue

Section

Robótica