Comparison of State-Space and LSTM-Based Virtual Temperature modelling in PEM fuel cells.

Authors

  • Abiodun Abiola Centro de Investigación en Tecnología, Energía y Sostenibilidad (CITES), Universidad de Huelva, España
  • Antonio Javier Barragán Centro de Investigación en Tecnología, Energía y Sostenibilidad (CITES), Universidad de Huelva, España
  • José Manuel Andújar Centro de Investigación en Tecnología, Energía y Sostenibilidad (CITES), Universidad de Huelva, España
  • Francisca Segura Centro de Investigación en Tecnología, Energía y Sostenibilidad (CITES), Universidad de Huelva, España

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17979/ja-cea.2026.47.13863

Keywords:

PEM Fuel Cells, Virtual Temperature Sensing, State-Space Modelling, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), System Identification, Fault-Tolerant Monitoring

Abstract

This study compares model-based state-space prediction and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) approaches for virtual outlet-temperature sensing in proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). Experimental data consisting of stack current, 
inlet cooling-water temperature, and outlet cooling-water temperature were collected under dynamic operating conditions. The  state-space model was developed using system identification techniques, while the LSTM model was trained using a data-driven 
sequence-learning approach. Different input combinations were evaluated using root mean square error (RMSE) and correlation  analysis. Results showed that both methods could track thermal behavior, although their performance depended strongly on input  selection and thermal observability. The LSTM demonstrated strong capability in learning nonlinear thermal dynamics, while  the state-space approach provided improved physical interpretability. 

References

Abiola, A., Manzano, F.S., Andújar, J.M., 2023. A Novel Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) Algorithm to Apply Artificial Intelligence-Based Maintenance in Electrolysers. Algorithms https://doi.org/10.3390/a16120541 16, 541.

Ariza, E., Correcher, A., Vargas-Salgado, C., 2023. PEMFCs Model-Based Fault Diagnosis: A Proposal Based on Virtual and Real Sensors Data Fusion. Sensors 23, 7383. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23177383

Guffanti, D., Pavon, W., 2025. MultivariateSystem Identification of Differential Drive Robot: Comparison Between State-Space and LSTM-Based Models. Sensors 25, https://doi.org/10.3390/s25185821 5821.

Ignatenko, V., Yudintsev, A., Lyapunov, D., 2019. Application of State-Space Method for Control System Analysis, in: 2019 International Siberian Conference on Control and Communications (SIBCON). Presented at the 2019 International Siberian Conference on Control and Communications (SIBCON), IEEE, Tomsk, Russia, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIBCON.2019.8729658

MathWorks, 2026. System Identification Toolbox User’s Guide. The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, USA.

Vuong, V.-D., Nguyen, L.-H., Goulet, J.-A., 2025. Coupling LSTM neural networks and state-space models through analytically tractable inference. International Journal of Forecasting 41, 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2024.04.002

Zheng, X., Zaheer, M., Ahmed, A., Wang, Y., Xing, E.P., Smola, A.J., 2017. State Space LSTM Models with Particle MCMC Inference. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1711.11179

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

Issue

Section

Modelado, Simulación y Optimización