Student interest in and familiarity with science from secondary to postgraduate level
Main Article Content
Abstract
Science process skills are one of the key indicators of scientific literacy. Nevertheless, few studies have examined how the factors affecting science literacy change over the course of the educational process. The aim of this paper is to analyse how students’ familiarity with and interest in science processes evolve over the course of their education. The sample for the study consisted of 200 students from different educational stages and institutions in the region of Valencia. Data were collected using a validated questionnaire and a discussion group comprising a representative group of students to provide insight into the quantitative data. The results show that familiarity with and interest in science processes improve over time, indicating the need for improved early-stage science teaching in relation to comprehension and contextualisation.
Keywords:
Downloads
Article Details
References
Aristizábal, C., y Restrepo, M. (2012). Inferences over a narrative text in contexts of interaction in early education. Universitas Psychologica, 11, 559-570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy11-2.itnc DOI: https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy11-2.itnc
Bevins, S. y Price, G. (2016). Reconceptualising inquiry in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 38(1), 17-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1124300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1124300
Bosch, H. E., Di Blasi, M. A., Pelem, M. E., Bergero, M. S., Carvajal, L. y Geromini, N. S. (2011). Nuevo paradigma pedagógico para enseñanza de ciencias y matemática. Avances en ciencias e ingeniería, 2(3), 131-140.
Córdova Frunz, J. L. (2005). La enseñanza de las ciencias. Alfabetización científica o ciencia para futuros científicos. Educación Química, 16(3), 398-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/fq.18708404e.2005.3.66102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/fq.18708404e.2005.3.66102
Duschl, R.A. y Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse inscience education. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 39-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560187 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560187
Friberg, F. y Öhlen, J. (2007). Searching for knowledge and understanding while living with impending death-a phenomenological case study. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 2, 217-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1748262070152377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17482620701523777
Geier, R., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Fishman, B., Soloway, E. y Chambers, J. (2008). Standardized Test Outcomes for Students Engaged in Inquiry-Based Science Curricula in the Context of Urban Reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20248
Gilbert, J.K. y Justi, R. (2016). Models and Modeling in Science Education. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29039-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29039-3
Granger, E., Bevis, T., Saka, Y., Southerland, S., Sampson, V. y Tate, R. (2012). The Efficacy of Student-Centered Instruction in Supporting Science Learning. Science, 338, 105-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223709 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223709
Grimalt-Álvaro, C., Couso, D., Boixadera-Planas, E. y Godec, S. (2022). “I see myself as a STEM person”: Exploring high school students’ self identificaction with STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(5), 720-745. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21742 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21742
Han, J., Kelley, T. R., Bartholomew, S. y Knowles, J. G. (2020). Sharpening STEL with integrated STEM. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 80(3), 24–29.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P. (2002). Knowledge producers or knowledge consumers? Argumentation and decision making about environmental management. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1171-1190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210134857 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210134857
Kelley, T. R., Knowles, J. G., Holland, J. D. y Han, J. (2020). Increasing high school teachers self-efficacyfor integrated STEM instruction through a collaborative community of practice. International Journal of STEM Education, 7 ,1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00211-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00211-w
Ketenci, T., Leroux, A., & Renken, M. (2020). Beyond student factors: A study of the impacton STEM careerattainment. Journal for STEM Education Research, 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00037-9
Knowles, J. G. (2017). Impacts of professional development in integrated STEM education on teacher self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and STEM career awareness. Purdue University Doctoral Dissertation. Recuperado de: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/techdissertations/4/
Ley Orgánica 3/2020, de 29 de diciembre, por la que se modifica la Ley Orgánica 2/2006, de 3 de mayo, de Educación (LOMLOE). Boletín Oficial del Estado. Madrid. 30 de diciembre de 2020, núm. 340, pp. 122868-122953.
Maison, M., Darmaji, D., Astalini, Kurniawan, D. y Indrawati, P. (2019). Science process skills and motivation. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7, 48-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.756 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.756
Miklos, T. (2019). Seguridad nacional y cambio climático: Prospectiva, escenarios y estrategias. Siglo XXI Editores México.
Miles, E. (2010). In-service elementary teachers' familiarity, interest, conceptual knowledge, and performance on science process skills. Tesis Doctoral. Southern Illinois University Carbondale. Recuperado de: https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1273&context=theses
Montero-Pau, J. y Tuzón, P. (2017). Inquiry-based science education in primary school in Spain: teachers' practices. X Congreso Internacional sobre Investigación en Didáctica de las Ciencias. Enseñanza de las ciencias, Nº Extraordinario, 2237-2241.
Muijs, D. y Reynolds, D. (2015). Teachers’beliefs and behaviors: What really matters? Journal of Classroom Interaction, 50(1), 25–40.
NRC. (1996). National Science Education Standards. National Academy Press.
NRC. (2000). National Science Education Standards. National Academy Press.
Nugent, G., Barker, B., Welch, G., Grandgenett, N., Wu, C. y Nelson, C. (2015). A model of factors contributing to STEM learning and career orientation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(7),1067–1088. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1017863 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1017863
Oliva, J.M. (2019). Distintas acepciones para la idea de modelización en la enseñanza de las ciencias. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 37(2), 5-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.2648 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.2648
Ortega-Torres, E. (2022). Training of future STEAM teachers: Comparison between primary degree students and secondary master’s degree students. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(2), 484-495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1319
Ordovás, J.M. (Presidente), Esteban, M., García-Retamero, R., González López-Valcárcel, B., Gordaliza, A., Inzitari, M., Jordano, P., Lecuona, I., Lechuga, L.M., López de Mántaras, R., Molero, J., Portela, A., Puga, D., Ramasco, J.J., Sánchez-Madrid, F., Valencia, A., Banda, E. y Serrano Alonso, M.S. - Grupo de Trabajo Interdisciplinar (2020). Informe del GTM sobre cambios en el Sistema de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (SCTI). Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (España).
Osborne, J.F. (2014). Teaching Critical Thinking? New Directions in Science Education. The School science review, 95, 53-62.
Peña, F. L. M., Peña, F. E. M. y Sánchez, J. D. A. (2017). Formación del docente y su adaptación al Modelo TPACK. Revista Ciencias Pedagógicas e Innovación, 5(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26423/rcpi.v5i1.154 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26423/rcpi.v5i1.154
Perona, J. J. V. (2017). Estudio sobre conocimiento disciplinar y conocimiento didáctico del contenido en ciencias del profesorado de educación primaria en formación inicial. Universitat de València.
Porlán, R., Martín del Pozo, M. R., Rivero García, A., Azcárate Goded, M. D. P., Pizzato, M. y Harres, J. (2010). El cambio del profesorado de Ciencias I: Marco teórico y formativo. Enseñanza de las ciencias, 28(1), 31-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.3619 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.3619
Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S. y Ropohl, M. (2016). Searching for a common ground – A literature review of empirical research on scientific inquiry activities. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 161–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1206351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1206351
Ross, J. A., Hogaboam-Gray, A. y Hannay, L. (2001). Effects of teacher efficacy on computer skills andcomputer cognitions of Canadian students in grades K-3. The Elementary School Journal, 102(2), 141–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/499697 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/499697
Rubio, M. J. y Varas, J. (2004). El análisis de la realidad en la intervención social: métodos y técnicas de investigación. CCS.
Rutherford, T., Long, J. J. y Farkas, G. (2017). Teacher value for professional development, self-efficacy, and student outcomes within a digital mathematics intervention. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 22–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.05.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.05.005
Shahzad, K. y Naureen, S. (2017). Impact of teacher self-efficacy on secondary school students’academicachievement. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 4(1), 48–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v4i1.1050
Skinner, A., Diller, D., Kumar, R., Cannon-Bowers, J., Smith, R., Tanaka, A., Julian, D. y Perez, R. (2018). Development and application of a multi-modal task analysis to support intelligent tutoring of complex skills. International Journal of STEM Education, 5 (14). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0108-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0108-5
Solaz-Portolés, J. J., Atiénzar Serrano, S. y Sanjosé López, V. (2016). Familiaridad e interés en los procesos de la ciencia de los estudiantes de Educación Secundaria. Revista Lasallista de Investigación, 13, 98-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22507/rli.v13n2a9
Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J. y Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEMeducation. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 23–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653
Tonucci (1995). El niño y la ciencia. En B. A. Troquel (Ed.). Con ojos de maestro (pp. 85-107). Losada.
Torres, R. M. (2006). Alfabetización y aprendizaje a lo largo de toda la vida. Revista interamericana de Educación de Adultos, 28(1), 25-38.
Vázquez-Alonso, Á., Manassero-Mas, M.A. y Bennàssar-Roig, A.J. (2015). La enseñanza y el aprendizaje de la naturaleza de la ciencia y tecnología (EANCYT): una investigación experimental con perspectiva latina. Revista Interacções, 11(34). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25755/int.6922
Wilson, D., Jones, D., Bocell, F., Crawford, J., Kim, M. J., Veilleux, N., Floyd-Smith, T., Bates, R. y Plett, M. (2015). Belonging and academic engagement among undergraduate STEM students: A multi-institutional study. Research in Higher Education, 56(7), 750–776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9367-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9367-x
Yoon, S., Evans, M. y Strobel, J. (2012). Development of the teaching engineering self-efficacy scale (TESS) for K–12 teachers. En Proceeding of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition. ASEE.