Estudio preliminar: engagement en arquitecturas de procesamiento paralelo a través del análisis de la familia de videoconsolas Sony PlayStation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17979/ja-cea.2026.47.13774Palabras clave:
Arquitecturas paralelas, motivación, engagement, rendimiento académicoResumen
Este trabajo presenta los resultados preliminares de un proyecto de investigación educativa diseñado para analizar la influencia del compromiso escolar o engagement en la asimilación de contenidos dentro de la asignatura Sistemas Computadores de Altas Prestaciones, de tercer curso del Grado en Ingeniería Informática. Mediante el Aprendizaje Basado en Proyectos y el estudio de casos histórico-tecnológicos, se propuso al estudiantado analizar la evolución de la familia consolas de videojuegos Sony PlayStation®. Los hallazgos iniciales revelan un alto nivel de participación y autonomía, así como una mejora cualitativa en las dimensiones conductual, cognitiva, afectiva y social del engagement estudiantil. Esta creciente implicación pone de relieve el potencial de las metodologías activas para optimizar el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje sobre arquitecturas informáticas complejas.
Referencias
Ahlfeldt, S., Mehta, S., & Sellnow, T. (2005). Measurement and analysis of student engagement in university classes where varying levels of PBL methods of instruction are in use. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436052000318541
Chowdhury, R. K. (2015). Learning and teaching style assessment for improving project-based learning of engineering students: A case of united Arab Emirates university. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 20(1), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.7158/D13-014.2015.20.1
Cook, K. (2009). A Suggested Project-Based Evolution Unit for High School: Teaching Content through Application. The American Biology Teacher, 71(2), 95-98. https://doi.org/10.2307/27669379
Johnson, C. S., & Delawsky, S. (2013). Project-based learning and student engagement. Academic Research Interanational, 4(4), 560-571.
Kong, Q.-P., Wong, N.-Y., & Lam, C.-C. (2003). Student engagement in mathematics: Development of instrument and validation of construct. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(1), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217366
Lee, E., & Hannafin, M. J. (2016). A design framework for enhancing engagement in student-centered learning: Own it, learn it, and share it. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 707-734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9422-5
Lee, W. y Reeve, J. (2012). Teachers’ estimates of their students’ motivation and engagement: Being in synch with students. Educational Psychology, (32), 727-747.
Rigo, D. Y. (2013). Compromiso hacia las tareas académicas. Dialnet, 15.
Rigo, D. Y. (2014). Enseñar y aprender. Promoción del compromiso, diseño instructivo e inteligencias múltiples. En U. de M. Edit.um. (Ed.), Investigación educativa en educación primaria (pp. 320-336).
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Schunk, D. H., Meece, J. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (2014). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications (4.a ed.). Pearson.
Slavich, G. M., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2012). Transformational Teaching: Theoretical Underpinnings, Basic Principles, and Core Methods. Educational Psychology Review, 24(4), 569-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9199-6
Wang, M. T., Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Hofkens, T. L., & Linn, J. S. (2016). The Math and Science Engagement Scales: Scale development, Validation, And psychometric properties. Learning and Instruction, 43, 16-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.008
Yetkiner, Z. E., Anderoglu, H., & Capraro, R. M. (2008). Project-based learning in middle grades mathematics. National Middle School Association, 1-8.
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., 2019. Facilitating Student Engagement Through Educational Technology: Towards a Conceptual Framework. Journal of Interactive Media in Education 2019(1), 1–14. DOI: 10.5334/jime.528
Chen, C., Yang, Y., 2019. Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review 26, 71–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001
Fredricks, J. A., Reschly, A. L., Christenson, S. L., (Eds.), 2019. Handbook of student engagement interventions: Working with disengaged students. Academic Press, [s.l.], London.
Ramos-Sandoval, R., Ramos-Diaz, J., 2020. Barriers and supports in engineering career development: An exploration of first-year students. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems 5(6), 920–925. DOI: 10.25046/aj0506109
Sukackė, V., Guerra, A. O. P. d. C., Ellinger, D., Carlos, V., Petronienė, S., Gaižiūnienė, L., Blanch, S., Marbà-Tallada, A., Brose, A., 2022. Towards Active Evidence-Based Learning in Engineering Education: A Systematic Literature Review of PBL, PjBL, and CBL. Sustainability 14(21), 13955. DOI: 10.3390/su142113955
Van den Beemt, A., MacLeod, M., Van der Veen, J., Van de Ven, A., Van Baalen, S., Klaassen, R., Boon, M., 2020. Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support. Journal of Engineering Education 109(3), 508–555. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20347
Zainuddin, Z., Chu, S. K. W., Shujahat, M., Perera, C. J., 2020. The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational Research Review 30, 100326. DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100326
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Arturo Aquino Martín, Antonio Javier Barragán Piña, Miguel Ángel Martínez Bohórquez, Francisco de Paula Rodríguez Miranda, Yolanda Ceada Ceada Garrido
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
