Characterizing 3D-printed soft joints: material, temperature, and infill density analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17979/ja-cea.2026.47.13775

Keywords:

Soft robotics, Smart structures, Mechatronic system modeling, design and optimization. , Advanced manufacturing and remanufacturing technologies, Robotic grasping and manipulation

Abstract

This paper presents the mechanical characterization of tendon-driven, multi-segment soft joints fabricated via Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), exploring internal infill density and active thermal foaming as primary tuning parameters. We systematically evaluate joints printed with Varioshore TPU—a foaming elastomer—across a thermal gradient  and varying porous infill densities, comparing the results against a standard Filaflex 82A baseline. Tensile tests reveal that modulating infill density provides a predictable, non-linear amplification of structural stiffness. Furthermore, thermal activation of the foaming agent in Varioshore TPU drastically enhances mechanical resistance. Compared to Filaflex, the foamed Varioshore achieves superior absolute strength and a vastly broader tunable bandwidth. These findings demonstrate that active foaming filaments offer great versatility and provide a baseline for designers to program both delicate compliance and high rigidity from a single material.

 

References

Chacón, J. M., Caminero, M. A., García-Plaza, E., & Núñez, P. J. (2017). Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection. Materials & Design, 124, 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065

Gallup, L., Trabia, M., O’Toole, B., & Fahmy, Y. (2024). Influence of fused deposition modeling process parameters on constitutive model of hyperelastic thermoplastic polyurethane. Polymers, 17(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17010026

Garzon-Hernandez, S., Garcia-Gonzalez, D., Jérusalem, A., & Arias, A. (2020). Design of FDM 3D printed polymers: An experimental-modelling methodology for the prediction of mechanical properties. Materials & Design, 188, 108414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108414

Henríquez, C. M. G., Sarabia, M. A., León, M., & Hernández, J. R. (2024). Procesos de impresión 3D y materiales para robótica blanda. Revista de plásticos modernos: Ciencia y tecnología de polímeros, 127(802), 3.

Monje, C. A., Relaño, C., Nagua, L. F., Martínez, S., & Balaguer, C. (2024). Eslabón para articulación blanda y articulación blanda que comprende dicho eslabón (Patent No. P202030726). Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.

Relaño, C., Muñoz, J., Monje, C. A., Martínez, S., & González, D. (2023). Modeling and Control of a Soft Robotic Arm Based on a Fractional Order Control Approach. Fractal and Fractional, 7(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7010008

Rodríguez-Sanz, A., Hernández, C. S., Martínez, S., & Monje, C. A. (2025). Influencia de la orientación del patrón de relleno en las propiedades mecánicas del TPU de dureza 82A. Simposios del Comité Español de Automática (CEA), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.64117/simposioscea.v1i1.33

Sánchez, C., González-Menocal, J., Mena, L., Muñoz, J., & Monje, C. A. (2026). Workspace Expansion in a Tendon-Driven Soft Joint through Base-Rotation Mechanism. 2026 IEEE 9th International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft), 1052-1058. https://doi.org/10.1109/RoboSoft67810.2026.11522947

Wang, Y., Xie, Z., Huang, H., & Liang, X. (2024). Pioneering healthcare with soft robotic devices: A review. Smart Medicine, 3(1), e20230045. https://doi.org/10.1002/SMMD.20230045

Yasa, O., Toshimitsu, Y., Michelis, M. Y., Jones, L. S., Filippi, M., Buchner, T., & Katzschmann, R. K. (2023). An overview of soft robotics. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, 6(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-control-062322-100607

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

Issue

Section

Robótica