Expresión de aprendizaje consciente e inconsciente mediante priming asociativo enmascarado
Contido principal do artigo
Resumo
Setenta y tres participantes recibieron entrenamiento de discriminación con presentaciones repetidas de dos secuencias de estímulos (E1AàE2A y E1B à E2B), en las que E1 eran estímulos enmascarados y E2 constituían estímulos imperativos para una tarea de tiempo de reacción (TR). Entre los ensayos de entrenamiento fueron insertados algunos ensayos de secuencias de estímulos incompatibles (E1A à E2B and E1B à E2A) para determinar los efectos del priming. Los resultados mostraron que los participantes perceptivamente inconscientes respondían más rápido a las secuencias compatibles que a las incompatibles, justo lo contrario que los participantes perceptivamente conscientes.
Downloads
Detalles do artigo
Referências
Abrams, R. L. & Greenwald, A. G. (2000). Parts out-weigh the whole (word) in unconscious analysis of meaning. Psychological Science, 11, 118-124.
Ansorge, U., Fuchs, I., Khalid, S. & Kunde, W. (2011). No conflict control in the absence of awareness. Psychological Research, 75, 351-365.
Barbot, A. & Kouider, S. (2012). Longer is not better: nonconscious overstimulation reverses priming influences under interocular suppression. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 74, 174-184.
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 443-446.
Furedy, J. J. & Riley, D. M. (1987). Human pavlovian autonomic conditioning and the cognitive paradigm. In G. Davey (Ed.), Cognitive processes and pavlovian conditioning in humans (pp. 1-25). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Gratton, G., Coles, J. & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480-506.
Greenwald, A. G., Draine, S. C. & Abrams, R. L. (1996). Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic activation. Science, 273, 1699-1702.
Kiesel, A., Kunde, W. & Hoffmann, J. (2007a). Unconscious priming according to multiple S-R rules. Cognition, 104, 89-105.
Kiesel, A., Kunde, W. & Hoffmann, J. (2007b). Mechanisms of subliminal response priming. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 307-315.
Klapp, S. T. & Greenberg, L. A. (2009). Temporary activation of perceptual-motor associations: a stimulus-response interpretation of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 5, 1266-1285.
Klotz, W. & Neumann, O. (1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 976-992.
Kunde, W. (2003). Sequential modulations of stimulus-response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 198-205.
Lovibond, P. F. & Shanks, D. R. (2002). The role of awareness in pavlovian conditioning: Empirical evidence and theoretical implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 3-26.
Marcel, A. J. (1983). Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 238-300.
Marcos, J. L. (2007). Associative learning of discrimination with masked stimuli. Learning and Motivation, 38, 75-88.
Marcos, J. L. (2011). Effect of interstimulus interval on acquisition and expression of associative learning with masked stimuli. Psicologica, 32, 207-222.
Mattler, U. & Palmer, S. (2012). Time course of free-choice priming effects explained by a simple accumulator model. Cognition, 123, 347-360.
Moors, A. & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297-326.
Neumann, O. & Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In C. Umilta and M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and Performance XV. Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing (pp. 123-150). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Reynvoet, B., Gevers, W. & Caessens, B. (2005). Unconscious primes activate motor codes through semantics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 991-1000.
Schlaghecken, F., Bowman, H. & Eimer, M. (2006). Dissociating local and global levels of perceptuo-motor control in masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 618-632.
Schneider, W., Dumais, S. T. & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). Automatic and control processing and attention. In R. Parasuraman and R. Davis (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 1-17). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.