El papel de los factores familiares y la autorregulación: problemas de comportamiento en adolescentes de Georgia
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar los factores psicosociales del comportamiento problemático de los adolescentes. Dentro de esta investigación, se evaluaron las relaciones entre la estructura familiar, el modelado parental, el monitoreo parental y la autorregulación de los adolescentes. Los datos se recopilaron mediante cuestionarios de autoinforme. La muestra consistió en 150 participantes de 14 a 17 años. Sesenta adolescentes estaban en conflicto con la ley, y los otros 90 adolescentes que no tenían ese contacto con el sistema legal. Los resultados muestran que más adolescentes en conflicto con la ley viven más a menudo en familias monoparentales que sus pares que no tienen una experiencia similar. Al mismo tiempo, los adolescentes que viven con padres solteros de promedio puntúan más alto de conducta problemática y más bajo de monitoreo parental. Los análisis de correlación y regresión revelaron que los modelos de comportamiento problemático de los padres y el monitoreo parental son predictores estadísticamente significativos del comportamiento problemático de los adolescentes. En el presente estudio, se reveló que la autorregulación es un correlato significativo del comportamiento problemático de los adolescentes, y que los factores familiares median en la relación entre autorregulación y el comportamiento problemático. Los resultados también confirman la importancia de un enfoque para la prevención del comportamiento desviado centrado principalmente en las medidas de apoyo familiar.
Palabras clave:
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Citas
Agnew, R. (2003). An integrated theory of the adolescent peak in offending. Youth and Society, 34(3), 263–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X02250094
Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development. Vol. 6. Six theories of child development (pp. 1-60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Bandura A. (1991a). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In W.M.Kurtines, J.L. Gewirtz (Eds). Handbook of moral behavior and Development (3rd Ed., pp.45-105). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bandura, A. (1991b). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50(2), 248-287.
Bartol C.R., Bartol A.M. (2014). (Eds.) Criminal behavior: a psychological approach (10thed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
Caprara, G.V., Scabini, E., Barbaranelli C., Pastorelli, C., Regalia, C., & Bandura, A., (1998). Impact of adolescents’ perceived self-regulatory efficacy on familial communication and antisocial conduct. European Psychologist 3(2), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.1027//1016-9040.3.2.125
Cauffman, E., Steinberg, L. (2001). (Im)maturity of judgement in adolescence: Why adolescents may be less culpable than adults. Behavioral Sciences & The law 18(6), 741-760. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.416
Espinosa, P., Clemente, M., (2011). Self-transcendence and self-oriented perspective as mediators between video games playing and aggressive behavior in teenagers. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 23(1), 68-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2138
Farrington, D.P., & Loeber, R. (1999). Transatlantic replicability of risk factors in the development of delinquency. In P.Cohen, C.Slomkowski, & L.N.Robins (Eds.), Historical and geographical influence on psychopathology (pp.299-329). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Farrington D.P. (2010). Family influences on delinquency. In D.W. Springer, A.R. Roberts (Eds.). Juvenile justice and Delinquency (pp.203-222). Ontario, Canada: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
Garfield, C. (2009). Variations in family composition. In H.Feldman (Ed.). Developmental-behavioral pediatric (4th Ed., pp. 94-102). Philadelphia, USA: Saunders, Elsevier.
Gottfredson, M. & Hirschi, T. (1990). A General Theory of Crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Grasmick, H., Tittle, C., Bursik, R., & Arneklev, B., (1993). Testing the Core Empirical Implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427893030001002
Jessor R. (2016). (Ed.) The origins and Development of problem behavior theory. Basel, Switzerland: Springer.
Jessor, R., Costa, F. M., & Turbin, M.S. (2002). Adolescent Health and Development Questionnaire. Boulder, Colorado: University of Colorado.
Jessor, R., Turbin, M. S., & Costa, F. M., (2010). Predicting developmental change in healthy eating and regular exercise among adolescents in China and the United States: The role of psychosocial and behavioral protection and risk. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 707-725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00656.x
Jessor, R., Turbin, M. S., & Costa, F. M., Dong, Q., Zhang, H., & Wang, C. (2003). Adolescent problem behavior in China and the United States: A cross-national study of psychosocial protective factors. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 329-360. https://doi.org/10.1111/1532-7795.1303004
Kremer, K.P., Flower, A., Huang, J., & Vaugh, M., G. (2016). Behavior problems and children’s academic achievement: A test of growth-curve models with gender and racial differences. Children and Youth Service Review 67, 95-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.06.003
Moilanen, K. L. (2007). The adolescent self-regulatory inventory: the development and validation of a questionnaire of short-term and long-term self-regulation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 835-848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9107-9
Moilanen, K. L., Shaw, D., & Fitzpatrick, A., (2009). Self-regulation in early adolescence: Regulations with mother-son relationship quality and Maternal regulatory support and Antagonism. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 39(11), 1357-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9485-x
Moffitt, T. E. (2018). Male antisocial behaviour in adolescence and beyond.” Nature human behavior, 2, 177-186.
Piquero, A. R., Farrington, D. P. & Blumstein, A. (2007). Key issues in criminal career research: New analyses of the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Siegel, L.J., & Welsh, B.C., (Eds.). (2017). Juvenile Delinquency: The core (6th ed.). Boston, USA: Cengage Learning.
Smith, C. A., & Stern, S. B. (1997). Delinquency and Antisocial Behavior: A Review of Family Processes and Intervention Research. Social Service Review, 71, 382-420. https://doi.org/10.1086/604263
Steinberg, L., (2009). Adolescent development and Juvenile justice. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 5, 459-485. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153603
The United Nations Development Programme: “To Enhance Gender Equality in Georgia”. (2013). Public perception on gender equality in politics and business. Tbilisi, Georgia: UNDP.
Trudeau, L., Mason, W. A., Randall, G. K., Spoth, R., & Ralston, E. (2012). Effects of parenting and Deviant peers on early to mid-adolescent conduct problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40(8), 1249–1264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-012-9648-1
Turbin, M. S., Jessor, R., Costa, F. M., Dong, Q., Zhang, H., & Wang, C. (2006). Protective and risk factors in health-enhancing behavior among adolescents in china and the United States: Does social context matter? Health Psychology, 25(4), 445-454. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.25.4.445
Walsh, A., & Beaver, K. M. (Eds). (2009). Biosocial criminology: New directions in theory and research. New York: Routledge.