Contenido principal del artículo

José Luis Marcos-Malmierca
Universidad de A Coruña
España
Biografía
Eduardo Barca Enríquez
Universidad de A Coruña
España
Biografía
Vol. Extr., núm. 01 (2017) - XIV CIG-PP, XIV Congreso de Psicopedagogía. Área 1: APRENDIZAJE, MEMORIA Y MOTIVACIÓN, Páginas 006-010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2017.0.01.2122
Recibido: jun. 16, 2017 Aceptado: dic. 11, 2017 Publicado: dic. 15, 2017
Cómo citar

Resumen

Setenta y tres participantes recibieron entrenamiento de discriminación con presentaciones repetidas de dos secuencias de estímulos (E1AàE2A y E1B à E2B), en las que E1 eran estímulos enmascarados y E2 constituían estímulos imperativos para una tarea de tiempo de reacción (TR). Entre los ensayos de entrenamiento fueron insertados algunos ensayos de secuencias de estímulos incompatibles (E1A à E2B and E1B à E2A) para determinar los efectos del priming. Los resultados mostraron que los participantes perceptivamente inconscientes  respondían más rápido a las secuencias compatibles que a las incompatibles, justo lo contrario que los participantes perceptivamente conscientes. 

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Citas

Abrams, R. L. & Greenwald, A. G. (2000). Parts out-weigh the whole (word) in unconscious analysis of meaning. Psychological Science, 11, 118-124.

Ansorge, U., Fuchs, I., Khalid, S. & Kunde, W. (2011). No conflict control in the absence of awareness. Psychological Research, 75, 351-365.

Barbot, A. & Kouider, S. (2012). Longer is not better: nonconscious overstimulation reverses priming influences under interocular suppression. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 74, 174-184.

Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 443-446.

Furedy, J. J. & Riley, D. M. (1987). Human pavlovian autonomic conditioning and the cognitive paradigm. In G. Davey (Ed.), Cognitive processes and pavlovian conditioning in humans (pp. 1-25). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

Gratton, G., Coles, J. & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480-506.

Greenwald, A. G., Draine, S. C. & Abrams, R. L. (1996). Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic activation. Science, 273, 1699-1702.

Kiesel, A., Kunde, W. & Hoffmann, J. (2007a). Unconscious priming according to multiple S-R rules. Cognition, 104, 89-105.

Kiesel, A., Kunde, W. & Hoffmann, J. (2007b). Mechanisms of subliminal response priming. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 307-315.

Klapp, S. T. & Greenberg, L. A. (2009). Temporary activation of perceptual-motor associations: a stimulus-response interpretation of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 5, 1266-1285.

Klotz, W. & Neumann, O. (1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 976-992.

Kunde, W. (2003). Sequential modulations of stimulus-response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 198-205.

Lovibond, P. F. & Shanks, D. R. (2002). The role of awareness in pavlovian conditioning: Empirical evidence and theoretical implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 3-26.

Marcel, A. J. (1983). Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 238-300.

Marcos, J. L. (2007). Associative learning of discrimination with masked stimuli. Learning and Motivation, 38, 75-88.

Marcos, J. L. (2011). Effect of interstimulus interval on acquisition and expression of associative learning with masked stimuli. Psicologica, 32, 207-222.

Mattler, U. & Palmer, S. (2012). Time course of free-choice priming effects explained by a simple accumulator model. Cognition, 123, 347-360.

Moors, A. & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297-326.

Neumann, O. & Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In C. Umilta and M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and Performance XV. Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing (pp. 123-150). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Reynvoet, B., Gevers, W. & Caessens, B. (2005). Unconscious primes activate motor codes through semantics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 991-1000.

Schlaghecken, F., Bowman, H. & Eimer, M. (2006). Dissociating local and global levels of perceptuo-motor control in masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 618-632.

Schneider, W., Dumais, S. T. & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). Automatic and control processing and attention. In R. Parasuraman and R. Davis (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 1-17). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.